Do different reference frames agree with total energy?

BomboshMan
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
I know total energy is conserved, but does this mean that different frames agree on the total energy of a particle?

I'm assuming they don't agree on energy, because if I measured the total energy of a particle moving relative to me (which would equal the rest energy plus its kinetic energy) surely this can't be the same as the total energy of the particle measured by someone in a frame where the particle's at rest (where the total energy would just be its rest energy). Or am I going wrong somewhere?

Thanks :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Indeed not: if you measure the energy of a massive particle at rest relative to you and then boost to the frame of an observer who has a non - vanishing relative velocity in say the +x direction then under a lorentz transformation the energy is mapped as m_{0}c^{2} \rightarrow \gamma m_{0}c^{2}.
 
BomboshMan said:
I know total energy is conserved, but does this mean that different frames agree on the total energy of a particle?

No. This is true both in relativistic and non-relativistic physics, by the way. Energy is conserved in any inertial reference frame, but is it not invariant between inertial reference frames.
 
Thanks guys :D
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
Back
Top