Do I Need the Acceleration Force for a Loop de Loop Diagram?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sarahaha288
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Diagram
AI Thread Summary
In creating a free body diagram for a loop de loop, it is essential to include the downward forces of gravity and the normal force, while the acceleration force is not necessary. A free body diagram should illustrate all individual forces acting on the object, without including net force or acceleration. The vector sum of these forces equals mass times acceleration, which is crucial for understanding motion. For a net force diagram, downward vectors for normal and gravitational forces are appropriate, but it is important to consider centripetal acceleration as well. Overall, accurately representing forces is key to analyzing the dynamics of the loop de loop.
sarahaha288
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
When making a free body diagram of a loop de loop i know that the downward force of gravity and the downward normal force are acting on it, and it is the acceleration force that works upward. But in the diagram is the acceleration force needed?

and also, in a net force diagram do you illustrate the acceleration force there? because without it then the net force would be going downward, which is obviously not that case. thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When you make a free body diagram just include all the individual forces. In your example include the normal force of the track on the cart traveling in the loop and the weight of the cart. You don't need net force or acceleration on a free body diagram.

After you have your forces the vector sum of those is equal to the mass times the acceleration of the object you drew the diagram for.
 
thanks that helps a lot for the free body diagram, but for the net force diagram i will then have to vectors pointing downward for the normal and the gravitational force. So then would the net force be pointing downward as well? or do i include something about centripital acceleration in there?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top