Do Infinity and Statistics Always Go Hand in Hand?

red apple
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi there, I have a question regarding infinity and statistics. (I hope there aren't too many questions with infinity on these forums)

I was wondering if you had some simple procedure, like say rolling a six sided die, and said you did this an infinite amount of times, would it be valid to say eventually you will roll a 6? Of course this is an ideal situation where each side has an equal chance of being rolled.

I'm wondering if it is accurate to say you will eventually have any outcome occur (assuming it is possible on any individual trial, no matter how unlikely)

Is this even valid considering its not really possible to actually have this happen in real life?

Also just for fun, what about an example taken to the extreme like an infinite amount of monkies all writing on typewriters, assuming they at least type something will at least one type a Shakespeare play exactly? Will an infinite amount type a Shakespeare play?

Thank you.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
red apple said:
I was wondering if you had some simple procedure, like say rolling a six sided die, and said you did this an infinite amount of times, would it be valid to say eventually you will roll a 6? Of course this is an ideal situation where each side has an equal chance of being rolled.

Not really, but you can say that the chance of rolling a 6 is 100% (exactly).

red apple said:
Is this even valid considering its not really possible to actually have this happen in real life?

Sure. We don't have perfectly fair dice in real life, either.

red apple said:
Also just for fun, what about an example taken to the extreme like an infinite amount of monkies all writing on typewriters, assuming they at least type something will at least one type a Shakespeare play exactly? Will an infinite amount type a Shakespeare play?

With probability 1, yes.
 
Note, however, that when you are dealing with something happening an infinite number of times (or working with continuous probability distributions), a probability of 1 does NOT mean it must happen nor does a probability of 0 mean it won't happen. It is possible to roll a die an infinite number of times and NOT get a "6". It is even possible to roll a die an infinite number of times and always get a "2" (Assuming that it is possible to roll a die and infinite number of times!) even though the probability of rolling a "6" is 1 and the probability of rolling all "2"s is 0.
 
Quite correct, Halls. I should have pointed that out.
 
CRGreathouse said:
Not really, but you can say that the chance of rolling a 6 is 100% (exactly).

I believe in mathematics we say that you will almost surely roll a 6.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Almost_surely
 
Diffy said:
I believe in mathematics we say that you will almost surely roll a 6.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Almost_surely

I say both "...with probability 1." and "...almost surely.", though I prefer the former. Only pedagogically do I say "The chance of ... is 100%."
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top