Do Observers at Rest See Time Dilation When Others Stop Instantaneously?

  • Thread starter Thread starter actionintegral
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relativity
actionintegral
Messages
305
Reaction score
5
A line of people are moving at the same speed, clocks all sync'd. They agree that at a certain time they will stop! Let's pretend they can stop
instantaneously.


Relativistically speaking, what will we who are at rest see?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
actionintegral said:
A line of people are moving at the same speed, clocks all sync'd. They agree that at a certain time they will stop! Let's pretend they can stop
instantaneously.


Relativistically speaking, what will we who are at rest see?
Their clocks are syncronized in their ref. frame but not in our. So, we will see they don't all stop at the same time: we will see the one at the end of the line (relative to the direction of motion) stopping first, the one at the head of the line stopping last. So, the total length of the line, after they have stopped, is the same as the length in their ref. frame when they're moving.
 
Thank you, lightarrow. Now please go to the train and platform thread and stop the madness!
 
What madness? That's exactly what JesseM has been saying throughout that thread.
 
Doc Al said:
What madness? That's exactly what JesseM has been saying throughout that thread.

You are right. And you have too, I see. I was referring to the fact that
the thread is into three pages and growing! It seems to me that the question as posed was too complex and led to the self-perpetuating confusion of the original poster.
 
acceleration

actionintegral said:
A line of people are moving at the same speed, clocks all sync'd. They agree that at a certain time they will stop! Let's pretend they can stop
instantaneously.


Relativistically speaking, what will we who are at rest see?
have please a critical look at

Radar echo, Doppler Effect and Radar detection in the uniformly accelerated reference frame
Authors: Rothenstein, Bernhard; Popescu, Stefan
The uniformly accelerated reference frame described by Hamilton, Desloge and Philpott involves the observers who perform the hyperbolic motion with constant proper acceleration gi. They start to move from different distances measured from the origin O of the inertial reference frame K(XOY), along its OX axis with zero initial velocity. Equipped with clocks and light sources they are engaged with each other in Radar echo, Doppler Effect and Radar detection experiments. They are also engaged in the same experiments with an inertial observer at rest in K(XOY) and located at its origin O. We derive formulas that account for the experiments mentioned above. We study also the landing conditions of the accelerating observers on a uniformly moving platform.
Comment: 15 pages, 8 figures, includes new results on radar detected times and distances
Full-text available from: http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0609118
 
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top