Does a Rod's Size Change When Rotating at the Speed of Light?

  • Thread starter Thread starter captain
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rod Rotating
captain
Messages
163
Reaction score
0
if a rod is moving close to the speed of light in its linear velocity and rotating at some angular velocity will the rod's length and width change as it rotates making it look all funky or will it do something else because it can't be treated as a rigid body? If it does do what i mentioned above then its angular momentum is changing and that means there is torque.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Because its endpoints cannot move faster than the speed of light, relative to some external observer (You say it is "moving close to the speed of light". You mean, of course, relative to this observer.) it will appear to bend. As has been said here many times, there is no such thing as a "rigid body" in relativity.
 
captain said:
making it look all funky
Depends, do you call http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Relativistic_Rolling_Wheel.png" "funky"?

PS I cannot vouch for the accuracy of these pictures, it is a wikipedia link after all, but they seem about right.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
56
Views
5K
Replies
35
Views
4K
Replies
42
Views
680
Replies
90
Views
3K
Back
Top