Does a Wire in an AC Circuit Have a Surface Charge Distribution?

AI Thread Summary
In an AC circuit with a capacitor and a connecting wire, the wire is expected to have a surface charge distribution due to its cylindrical shape. However, some argue that under ideal conditions, the wire would not retain a net charge or experience internal currents when disconnected from the battery and capacitor. The discussion highlights that while capacitor plates have net charge, the wire itself does not necessarily exhibit a charge distribution without current flow. For a more accurate analysis, factors such as the wire's size and orientation must be considered, potentially requiring Maxwell's Equations. Ultimately, the debate centers on the behavior of charge distribution in ideal versus non-ideal components.
themagiciant95
Messages
56
Reaction score
5
I have a simple AC circuit. For example a battery with a capacitor.
In the steady-state the capacitor has the same V of the battery.
The wire that connect the two components is a very small cylindrical conductor, so it should have a surface charge distribution. It's that correct ? If no, why ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am quite sure that there will be a surface charge distribution generating an electric field in the appropriate direction.

Honestly, I think you can easily simplify the problem by just understanding that this circular conductor is basically a really thick piece of wire. The properties should be similar to a normal wire, just that it is now so thick that it takes the shape of a cylinder.

Hope that helped.
 
  • Like
Likes themagiciant95
themagiciant95 said:
it should have a surface charge distribution. It's that correct ?
Yes it is correct
 
  • Like
Likes themagiciant95
themagiciant95 said:
The wire that connect the two components is a very small cylindrical conductor, so it should have a surface charge distribution.

I hate to disagree with @Dale because he is so much smarter than I am, but in this case I do disagree.

We are assuming ideal components with zero leakage current.

Consider suddenly disconnecting that wire segment from the battery and the capacitor. Only one of the following can be true.
  1. The wire is left with a net charge.
  2. Following disconnection, there are brief internal currents in the wire as the charge distribution rearranges itself.
  3. No change, no net charge, no currents in the wire.
I believe that #3 is the correct one.

Remember we speak of the wire, not the plates of the capacitor. Capacitor plates do have net charge and surface distributions.

The OP's question could have left the capacitor out. If we take a length of wire and connect it to one terminal of a battery, is there anything that happens with net charge or charge distribution in the wire? With ideal components, I say no because changes in charge distribution require currents. With non-ideal components, the wire can have parasitic capacitance to ground and thus need current flow to change its voltage with respect to ground.

If you want to consider the portion of the wire closest to the capacitor, then actual sizes, orientation and lengths become important and you must solve the problem using Maxwell's Equations. But the OP posed the question without reference to size, & length.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top