Does Asymmetry in Spacecraft Flyby Trajectories Cause Unexpected Energy Gains?

AI Thread Summary
Spacecraft on certain flyby trajectories around Earth experience unaccounted energy gains, particularly during asymmetric flybys, which produce the greatest increases in velocity. The asymmetry arises from the spacecraft approaching and departing at different latitudes, leading to questions about the average distance from Earth during these phases. It is posited that the spacecraft may be further from Earth when gravity is accelerating it before perigee and closer when decelerating after passing perigee. This phenomenon remains an open question, suggesting a need for further research into the underlying mechanics. The discussion references a paper proposing that special relativity might explain these anomalies.
Zman
Messages
96
Reaction score
0
It has been found that spacecraft on certain flyby trajectories around the Earth gain an amount of energy that is unaccounted for.

The asymmetric trajectories highlight this anomaly as described here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flyby_anomaly" .

I read that the most asymmetric flyby’s produce the greatest ‘unexpected increase’ in velocity.
The asymmetry refers to the fact that the spacecraft might approach at one latitude and leave by another. (I can't actually understand how this asymmetry occurs. Doesn't the Earth appear gravitationally as a point source?)

Anyway my main question is;

Does this asymmetry equate to the spacecraft ’s approach being on average further away from the Earth than its average distance from the Earth on the exit?

In other words: Is the spacecraft further from the Earth on average when the earth’s gravity is accelerating it positively just before it reaches the perigee?
And following on: Is the spacecraft closer to the Earth on average when the earth’s gravity is decelerating it after passing the perigee?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This hypothesis of scientists about the origin of the mysterious signal WOW seems plausible only on a superficial examination. In fact, such a strong coherent radiation requires a powerful initiating factor, and the hydrogen atoms in the cloud themselves must be in an overexcited state in order to respond instantly. If the density of the initiating radiation is insufficient, then the atoms of the cloud will not receive it at once, some will receive it earlier, and some later. But then there...
Back
Top