Does Every Attractive Potential in One Dimension Have a Bound State?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dahaka14
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Shankar
Dahaka14
Messages
73
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Exercise 5.2.2 (b.)
Prove the following theorem: Every attractive potential in one dimension has at least one bound state. Hint: Since V is attractive, if we define V(\infty)=0, it follows that V(x)=-|V(x)| for all x. To show that there exists a bound state with E<0, consider
\psi_{\alpha}(x)=\left(\frac{\alpha}{\pi}\right)^{1/4}\text{e}^{-\alpha x^{2}/2}
and calculate

E(\alpha)=<\psi_{\alpha}|H|\psi_{\alpha}>, H=-\frac{\hbar^{2}}{2m}\frac{d^{2}}{dx^{2}}-|V(x)|.

Show that E(\alpha) can be made negative by suitable choice of \alpha. The desired result follows from the application of the theorem approved above.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


I evaluated the expectation value using the given wave function and special Hamiltonian and received a simpler equation of E=\frac{\alpha\hbar^{2}}{4m}-\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}|V(x)|\psi_{\alpha}^{2}dx. I have no idea where to go from here.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hmmm... You might try using the mean value theorem for integration.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top