Does Fluid Near Solid Interfaces Move Faster Due to Viscosity Differences?

AI Thread Summary
Fluid dynamics near solid interfaces is governed by the boundary layer concept, where fluid velocity is zero at the solid surface and increases with distance from it. The no-slip boundary condition is fundamental, indicating that fluid in contact with a solid does not move relative to it. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding these principles when simulating fluid behavior, particularly in computational models. Recommended literature includes "Viscous Fluid Flow" by Frank White and "Boundary Layer Theory" by Schlichting for deeper insights. Overall, the initial assumption about fluid speed near solid interfaces is incorrect, as it contradicts established fluid dynamics principles.
diegolas
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

This is my first post and my background is in Computer Science, so pardon me if my terminology is not correct or even I sound ignorant Physics-wise :)

Anyways, I implemented a semi-Lagrangian based Navier-Stokes (NS) solver and it's running smoothly on a CUDA-capable GPU and I wondered if you guys can help me with something I noticed (maybe it's a law or maybe I'm just wrong).

Question: I got the impression from watching how fluids behave in real life (and for instance in the beach), and I think the fluid near the solid interface (e.g. sand for that matter) moves faster than the one on top? Is it true? Why is it? Intuitively I thought it may have to do with the delta in the viscosity (say, solid/sand - water interface), so the fluid "slips" more easily? If so, if I was to generalize the fact, is it true that the water near the solid moves faster than the one in "the middle" and near the air (maybe if we assume ideal conditions, no gravity, etc)?

Is there any law describing this? I mean, probably can be guessed from NSE but I was wondering if this has any fancy name.

Could you please recommend me literature so I can dig in more about this? I don't have access to ScienceDirect right now, and I'm not probably buying any book in the near future, so if it's not too much asking, I'd like to suggest you guys point me to papers available online?

Cheers,
Diego
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What you are talking about is the boundary layer, which is opposite to what you describe. A fluid at te solid surface does not move at all, actually. This is one of the fundamental boundary conditions for the NS equations so it leads me to wonder how you were solving it without that BC.

At any rate, fluid near a surface has zero velocity (with respect to the surface) and increases as you move away from the surface. There are tons of papers on it from around the turn of the century, but they are so old you may have trouble finding them. I know you seem averse to books, but I would suggest looking at "Viscous Fluid Flow" by Frank White. It has everything you Should need. If you want to dig even deeper, "Boundary Layer Theory" by Schlichting is the "sacred text" on the subject.
 
Thanks for the reply :)

Well, I didn't mention it but I was solving it with no-slip BC. But in any case, what I was trying to do is to inject external (arbitrary) forces so the fluid (water) behaves like real-life waves --maybe I have to look how water moves again.

Thanks for the bibliography, I'll try to get the books though I doubt the library has them xD
 
If it is a university library then I guarantee they have them.

At any rate, th no-slip condition is simply a mathematical translation of what I said. The fluid is motionless with respect to the wall it contacts. No external forces are needed because the boundary condition takes care of that for you.

For example, if you solve just the plain NS equations over a flat plate you get the Blasius solution, which precisely shows the boundary layer. It is one of the few analytical solutions that are possible, yet one of the most important.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top