Does 'Isolated' and 'Free' Mean the Same in Physics Context?

  • Thread starter Thread starter grzz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mean
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether the terms "isolated" and "free" in physics are redundant when describing a particle. Participants argue that while the terms may seem to imply each other, they actually refer to different concepts: "isolation" pertains to the absence of environmental interactions, while "freedom" relates to the lack of motion restrictions. Examples are provided, such as ions in traps being isolated but not free, and electrons in lasers being free but not isolated. The consensus suggests that redundancy in language can be beneficial for clarity in physics. Overall, the distinction between the terms is important for accurate scientific communication.
grzz
Messages
1,030
Reaction score
26
Is there redundancy in the phrase ‘an isolated free particle’?

Do not the words ‘free’ and ‘isolated’ imply each other?

Any help is much appreciated.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
grzz said:
Is there redundancy in the phrase ‘an isolated free particle’?
Do not the words ‘free’ and ‘isolated’ imply each other?

Perhaps they should, but natural language is sufficiently imprecise that we're better off with a bit of redundancy.
 
Thanks Nugatory.

I wonder whether Dirac would have used the phrase ‘an isolated free particle’!
 
No, I don't think there is redundancy.
E.g. an ion in an ion trap can be extremely well isolated from the environment but you could hardly refer to it as "free".
The electrons in a free electron laser are (obviously) free, but since they are radiating they are not isolated.

I think of "isolation" as referring to the absence of interaction with the environment, whereas "free" means that the motion of the object itself is not restricted.
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top