Does Less Friction Always Mean a Shorter Braking Distance?

  • Thread starter Thread starter eddywalrus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Braking Friction
AI Thread Summary
Less friction on surfaces like ice or wet roads increases braking distance compared to more frictional surfaces like rocky or sandy roads. While it seems intuitive that less friction would lead to shorter braking distances, the physics of motion indicates that friction opposes movement rather than acceleration. When braking, a car continues to move in its original direction while decelerating, meaning a greater friction force would indeed reduce braking distance. The misconception that less friction results in shorter stopping distances can lead to dangerous driving situations, particularly in northern states with icy conditions. Understanding the role of friction is crucial for safe driving practices.
eddywalrus
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
I was taught that in conditions where there is less friction, such as on icy or wet roads, the braking distance of a car, is less than if the car was traveling in conditions with more friction, such as when the road is rocky or sandy.

Although it makes sense intuitively, I recalled that friction opposes motion and not acceleration. So, for example, when a car travels to the right, and the driver applies the brakes, the car will still travel to the right, but just decelerate until it stops completely. Since friction opposes movement, and the car is still moving to the right when braking, then the direction of the friction force is to the left -- so shouldn't a larger friction force decrease the braking distance?

Thanks for your help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Absolutely. Whoever said less friction results in a smaller braking distance may be in for some excitement if he lives in a northern state!
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top