Does Light Curving Around the Sun Prove It Has Weight?

  • Thread starter Thread starter myswhatevr
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light
myswhatevr
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Ok, I know this topic has been discussed before..

I just recently found out that we can see the light from a star that is BEHIND the sun (from where the Earth stands) because the light of the star is repeling the Earth's gravity which causes the light tocurve around the sun which is why we can see it...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
myswhatevr said:
Ok, I know this topic has been discussed before..

I just recently found out that we can see the light from a star that is BEHIND the sun (from where the Earth stands) because the light of the star is repeling the Earth's gravity which causes the light tocurve around the sun which is why we can see it...
Yes. Light has both inertial mass (since light carries momentum) , active gravitational mass (since light can generate a gravitational field and passive gravitational mass (since light is affected by a gravitational field.

Feynman discusses this in his lectures, i.e. he explains that since light has energy and energy gas mass that light is affected by gravity. I.e. From "The Feynman Lectures on Physics," Vol -I page 7-11 - Section entitled Gravitation and Relativity
One feature of this new law is quite easy to understand is this: In Einstein relativity theory, anything which has energy has mass -- mass in the sense that it is attracted gravitationaly. Even light, which has energy, has a "mass". When a light beam, which has energy in it, comes past the sun there is attraction on it by the sun.
See also
https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=65079&postcount=1

Pete
 
myswhatevr said:
I just recently found out that we can see the light from a star that is BEHIND the sun
It is very confusing to use words like "behind" in curved spacetimes.
 
Yes … some observers' behinds are more curved than others. :smile:
 
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top