Does Mass Have Volume? Photons Too?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dailydc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Volume
AI Thread Summary
Mass does not have volume in the traditional sense; rather, matter has volume due to the finite radius of electron orbitals around atomic nuclei. Photons, while possessing momentum, do not have rest mass and therefore lack a defined volume like matter. At the quantum level, the concept of volume becomes complex, as particles like electrons are described by wavefunctions that indicate probabilities rather than fixed positions. Unlike fermions, bosons such as photons can occupy the same space simultaneously, challenging everyday perceptions of volume and occupancy. Ultimately, the nature of volume and mass differs significantly between classical and quantum physics.
dailydc
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Hi
Question is
Mass have volume ?

Another question is
Photons have mass "m=E/(c^2)" or "m = h*f/c^2" so
Photons have volume ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is no physical size to a particle the way you think of it in your daily life. MATTER, not mass, has volume because electron orbitals in atoms have a finite radius from the nucleus and the repulsion of electrons vs electrons keeps other atoms at a distance, even when bound into molecules.

Light does not have mass in the sense of stationary rest mass, but it does have momentum. Usually momentum is a product of mass x velocity, but photons have no mass. Also, photons are Bosons, and as such they can occupy the same spot as other photons. In effect, they have no real volume like you would imagine it.
 
Drakkith said:
There is no physical size to a particle the way you think of it in your daily life. MATTER, not mass, has volume because electron orbitals in atoms have a finite radius from the nucleus and the repulsion of electrons vs electrons keeps other atoms at a distance, even when bound into molecules.

Light does not have mass in the sense of stationary rest mass, but it does have momentum. Usually momentum is a product of mass x velocity, but photons have no mass. Also, photons are Bosons, and as such they can occupy the same spot as other photons. In effect, they have no real volume like you would imagine it.

You say , W bosons and Charm quarks and electrons have no volume and do not Occupy space ?! :confused:

if we have plank volume ( 1.616252×10^−35 m ) ^ 3 , is it possible in the volume there are one million electron ?:confused:
 
Last edited:
dailydc said:
You say , W bosons and Charm quarks and electrons have no volume and do not Occupy space ?! :confused:

if we have plank volume ( 1.616252×10^−35 m ) ^ 3 , is it possible in the volume there are one million electron ?:confused:

No, I am saying the concept of "volume" is not the same at the quantum level. Classically a particle can have a volume, but when you get into quantum mechanics it gets more complicated. For example, the probability of finding two electrons at the exact same spot at the exact same time in the exact same state is 0. You could say that the "volume" of the electron could be found by measuring the electric field it emits, but you would be ignoring other issues. Conversely, a photon or other particle that does not obey the Pauli Exclusion Principle can easily occupy the same state as any number of other bosons. Meaning that it can occupy the same spot in space at the same time with any number of other bosons. This seems weird to most people, as our everyday experiences tell us differently. After all, when I stack cups in my cabinets they don't merge into one cup!

Then you would need to get into wavefunctions. An electron has a wavefunction that determines its position and momentum. But where exactly is the electron? We don't know! Does it occupy the entire region that the wavefunction describes, or does it roam around the area? See what I'm getting at?
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...

Similar threads

Back
Top