Does Subtracting a Constant from a Hamiltonian's Diagonal Change Its System?

fargoth
Messages
318
Reaction score
6
correct me if I am wrong..
as i see it, i can subtract any constant from the diagonal of the hamiltonian without really changing the system it describes... am i right?

if i got a two state system, the hamiltonian can look like this:

\left( <br /> \begin{array}{cc}<br /> 0 &amp; P_{2-&gt;1} \\<br /> P_{1-&gt;2} &amp; \Delta E \\<br /> \end{array} <br /> \right)

where \Delta E=H_{22}-H_{11}

if I am right so far... then here's my problem - when you diagonize the matrix it doesn't have the same eigenvalues (i mean not even the same delta...) if you add or subtract from the diagonal... and that can't be right... so what's wrong in my view of things?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
fargoth said:
correct me if I am wrong..
as i see it, i can subtract any constant from the diagonal of the hamiltonian without really changing the system it describes... am i right?

if i got a two state system, the hamiltonian can look like this:

\left( <br /> \begin{array}{cc}<br /> 0 &amp; P_{1-&gt;2} \\<br /> P_{2-&gt;1} &amp; \Delta E \\<br /> \end{array} <br /> \right)

where \Delta E=H_{22}-H_{11}

if I am right so far... then here's my problem - when you diagonize the matrix it doesn't have the same eigenvalues (i mean not even the same delta...) if you add or subtract from the diagonal... and that can't be right... so what's wrong in my view of things?


You must be making a mistake.
Imagine H0 the original hamiltonian (the one you quote, for instance), and |e1> an eigenvector.
Then we have H0 |e1> = E1 |e1>

Now consider that we add C 1 to H0 (unit matrix times constant C).

Then of course C 1|e1> = C |e1>

Define H1 = H0 + C 1

H1 |e1> = H0 |e1> + C 1 |e1> = E1 |e1> + C |e1> = (E1 + C) |e1>

So we see that |e1> is again an eigenvector of H1, but this time with eigenvalue E1 + C. All eigenvalues of H1 will be the eigenvalues of H0 plus C, and the eigenvectors will be the same. The differences between the eigenvalues will of course remain the same (C will be eliminated).

cheers,
Patrick.
 
yeah, i found my mistake... the delta remains the same... :blushing:
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top