Does the Ball Do Work on the Kid? Newton's Third Law Explained

AI Thread Summary
According to Newton's Third Law, a ball exerts an equal force on a kid as the kid exerts on the ball. The discussion centers on whether the ball does work on the kid, with one viewpoint suggesting that since the kid's hands move back when catching the ball, the ball does perform work. However, another perspective argues that if the kid is not moved by the ball, then it does not do work. The situation becomes more complex when considering the motion of the kid's hands. Ultimately, the conclusion hinges on the interpretation of motion and force in the context of the interaction.
harp AP 2010
Messages
30
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Newton's 3rd law says that a ball exerts as much force on a kid as the kid exerts force on the ball. Is it correct to say the ball does work on the kid?


Homework Equations


I don't think the ball does work because the kid is not moved by the ball.


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you think of it from the point of view of the kid's hands then there is some motion to the kid. He doesn't just catch it with his hands and they (his hands) stay still, rather they move back a certain distance, albeit a relatively small distance. So yes, the ball does do work on the kid.

*Sorry just realized that the situation didn't involve him catching the ball at all.*
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'

Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'

Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
View full post »

Thread 'Struggling to understand the concept of this question (ice cube in water optics question)'

TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
View full post »

Similar threads

Newton's Third Law for book on a table
Replies
8
Views
3K
How do you identify the systems in which Newton's Third Law is obeyed?
Replies
6
Views
1K
Blowing Into Your Own Sail
Replies
25
Views
1K
Newton's third law and weight
Replies
13
Views
941
How Does Newton's Third Law Apply When a Bat Hits a Ball?
Replies
11
Views
3K
Force Questions -- Snooker ball collision and a rock through a window
Replies
13
Views
2K
Why doesn't Newtons third law also apply to the frame?
Replies
2
Views
2K
Problem involving energy/motion
Replies
19
Views
2K
Force exerted on Earth by accelerating ball
Replies
4
Views
1K
How Does Newton's Law of Cooling Affect Heat Loss Calculations?
Replies
2
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top