Does the Flow Coefficient Cv have any units?

AI Thread Summary
The flow coefficient Cv in valves is typically expressed as a unitless number, aiding engineers in valve selection based on flow capacity at a specific pressure drop. While Cv can theoretically have units, such as gallons per minute multiplied by the square root of pressure, it is generally used without them in practical applications. In Europe, the Kv value serves a similar purpose using SI units. The discussion highlights that coefficients like Cv are intended to be dimensionless, serving as multiplication factors rather than specific measurements. Misunderstandings may arise when terms like "flow coefficient" are used ambiguously, potentially referring to different coefficients in fluid dynamics.
Rahul Baro
Messages
14
Reaction score
4
TL;DR Summary
Why Flow coefficient doesn't have any unit ?
Flow coefficient in valves doesn't have any units. why?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Lnewqban said:
It can have units, if you want: (gallons / minute) * sqrt (1/p.s.i.)

Please, see:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flow_coefficient
in what cases it does not have any unit?
 
In practical terms, the coefficient is expressed only as a number.
For example, the manufacturer of a valve tells an engineer that he offers two valves, one with Cv=20 and another one with Cv=10.
Those numbers by themselves, help the engineer select the valve that best fits its system and/or control modulation.
The first valve is able to carry 20 US gallons per minute for a pressure drop of 1 p.s.i., while the second valve, for the same pressure drop, will carry 10 US gallons per minute.
 
o
Lnewqban said:
In practical terms, the coefficient is expressed only as a number.
For example, the manufacturer of a valve tells an engineer that he offers two valves, one with Cv=20 and another one with Cv=10.
Those numbers by themselves, help the engineer select the valve that best fits its system and/or control modulation.
The first valve is able to carry 20 US gallons per minute for a pressure drop of 1 p.s.i., while the second valve, for the same pressure drop, will carry 10 US gallons per minute.
okay! i understood the idea.. thanks alot!
 
In Europe, they use the Kv instead (SI units).
You are welcome! :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes Rahul Baro
Lnewqban said:
In practical terms, the coefficient is expressed only as a number.
To expand/generalize, by definition a coefficient is a unitless multiplication factor, like a percentage. For example, a friction coefficient is a percentage/fraction of normal force "converted" to friction. Similarly, a flow coefficient is a fraction of velocity pressure lost in a valve or other device. The way we often use it in IP units, I think it is a bastardization that includes some rolled-up constants.

So usually if you see units, it's for clarification; eg, N/N (friction).
 
  • Like
Likes Rahul Baro and Lnewqban
Where Cv is 'expressed' as a unitless coefficient, imprecision is present. See post #2. Dimensions are a gift from God - respect them. Or else. There are cases where true coefficients exist (see post #7). Cv isn't one of them.
 
  • Like
Likes Rahul Baro
russ_watters said:
To expand/generalize, by definition a coefficient is a unitless multiplication factor, like a percentage. For example, a friction coefficient is a percentage/fraction of normal force "converted" to friction. Similarly, a flow coefficient is a fraction of velocity pressure lost in a valve or other device. The way we often use it in IP units, I think it is a bastardization that includes some rolled-up constants.

So usually if you see units, it's for clarification; eg, N/N (friction).
okay! thank you so much for the help :)
 
  • #10
Careful. People say "flow coefficient" and this should mean "Cv" as used by valve manufacturers and discussed above. But sloppy people might mean "k" or "resistance coefficient" sometimes also called zeta. This goes into the Darcy equation as fL/D, a dimensionless multiplier on the velocity-squared term.
 
  • Like
Likes Lnewqban
Back
Top