Does the MBR display orbital motion relative to us?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the possibility of detecting motion in the cosmic microwave background radiation (CMB) relative to its expansion. Participants express uncertainty about visualizing movement perpendicular to this expansion, noting that the CMB appears to have varying redshifts depending on the direction of observation, suggesting some form of motion. The idea of gathering data from distant civilizations using COBE-style detectors is proposed as a means to investigate potential anisotropies in the CMB that could indicate universal rotation. Suggestions include analyzing large-scale variations in the SDSS dataset to identify angular and redshift discrepancies. The conversation highlights the complexity of testing these concepts and the need for future cosmological measurements to clarify the parameters involved.
Loren Booda
Messages
3,108
Reaction score
4
Can we discern any movement by the microwave background perpendicular to its expansion?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I hope one of the experts here will weigh in on this.

I am probably not understanding your question properly. But the cosmic radiation comes to us from all directions in space, so I am not sure how to even visualize what you mean by "perpendicular to its expansion." There is a certain sense in which the Earth (and the Milky Way galaxy) can be said to be moving, since the radiation is somewhat less redshifted in a certain direction than in the opposite direction, as measured by the COBE satellite a few years back.
 
Let me put it this way, Janitor (he who guards the door): is there any net rotataton of the universe from our perspective?
 
Interesting thought!

If we were to receive cooperation from alien civilizations living way out in a variety of places in the visible universe, each of them sending us radio transmissions (in English!) telling us what their own COBE-style detectors find in the way of anisotropies in the radiation, would we be able to piece the data together in a way that leads us to believe that the universe as a whole is rotating? Is that sort of what you are talking about? (As to what it would be rotating with respect to, I'll leave that to philosophers. )
 
Good enough. I. e., can cosmologically correlated redshifts (or anisotropies) in an expanding universe infer orbital motion as well?
 
Originally posted by Loren Booda
Good enough. I. e., can cosmologically correlated redshifts (or anisotropies) in an expanding universe infer orbital motion as well?
You would probably need to break this down into a number of more tightly worded questions before it could, in principle, be amenable to testing.

Perhaps one way to approach this would be to ask what large scale variations there are in the SDSS data (you'll need just about the full SDSS dataset - not due for public release for several more years yet - because 2dF doesn't cover enough of the sky); you could look for both angular variations and distance/redshift ones.

Here's a paper, by Tegmark et al (including the SDSS consortium) which discusses some of the constraints on a range of cosmological parameters, from SDSS data and combined WMAP/SDSS data. The last sentence of the abstract: "Including tensors, running tilt, neutrino mass and equation of state in the list of free parameters, many constraints are still quite weak, but future cosmological measurements from SDSS and other sources should allow these to be substantially tightened."
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Both have short pulses of emission and a wide spectral bandwidth, covering a wide variety of frequencies: "Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs) are detected over a wide range of radio frequencies, including frequencies around 1400 MHz, but have also been detected at lower frequencies, particularly in the 400–800 MHz range. Russian astronomers recently detected a powerful burst at 111 MHz, expanding our understanding of the FRB range. Frequency Ranges: 1400 MHz: Many of the known FRBs have been detected...
Back
Top