Does the resistance of a material vary when introduced into water?

AI Thread Summary
Introducing a copper wire into water may affect its resistance due to the high resistivity of pure water, which acts as a dielectric material. The resistance of the wire itself should remain unchanged, but the water could create a parallel resistance scenario, complicating measurements. Conductivity changes in the water over time due to ionic interactions with copper may also influence results. Testing the wire's resistance before and after immersion in water can provide immediate insights into any effects. Overall, while water's presence introduces variables, the fundamental resistance of the copper wire should not be significantly altered.
Cloruro de potasio
Messages
30
Reaction score
1
Suppose we have a copper wire, of resistance R, and we introduce it in water, when applying now a certain potential difference between the two ends, will the intensity that circulates through the wire be the same, and therefore also the resistance ?, is there going to be a potential drop due to the resistance presented by water, since it is a dielectric material?

Your answers would help me a lot.

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What research have you done on this so far? What have you found out?
 
I am preparing a small experimental project for the university on the influence of temperature on the resistivity of metals, and I have seen that one of the possible ways of measuring it is by introducing the material into water and increasing the temperature, but I have not just seen very clear if, when introduced into water, the measures will be correct or if the presence of water (as a dielectric material) will have some influence ...
 
You did not answer my question. What research have you done on this so far? What have you found out? By "this" I mean immersion in water's affect on overall resistance.
 
Cloruro de potasio said:
I am preparing a small experimental project for the university on the influence of temperature on the resistivity of metals, and I have seen that one of the possible ways of measuring it is by introducing the material into water and increasing the temperature, but I have not just seen very clear if, when introduced into water, the measures will be correct or if the presence of water (as a dielectric material) will have some influence ...

You know, this is such a SIMPLE thing to test, especially when you are "... preparing a small experimental project...". Why can't you have a coil of copper wire, measure its resistance with a multimeter, and then immerse it in water at room temperature with the ends sticking out (so that you won't mess up the contact point with your multimeter), re-measure the resistance?

This will tell you almost immediately if immersing it in water will affect the resistance, won't it? What prevented you from doing this?

Zz.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71, davenn, Motore and 1 other person
Cloruro de potasio said:
if the presence of water (as a dielectric material) will have some influence
Pure water has a very high resistivity (you refer to it as a dielectric material). Wouldn't immersing a wire in water not be much the same as surrounding it in an insulating sleeve (like most of the 'wires' that people use).
Clue: what's the formula for the equivalent R of two Resistances in Parallel?
 
There are so many variables here but if there is an effect and its very small how will you measure it?
 
Dadface said:
There are so many variables here
But only a very few important ones if you remember the vast difference between the resistivity of the metal and the dielectric and make some justified approximations.
 
  • Like
Likes Dale
If this is a DC measurement, the (real part) of the dielectric constant should not matter. For pure water the conductivity will be small but is there any ionic chemistry with the copper over time? The worst case test might be an "almost shorted" solenoidal coil of wire of considerable length with and without water. And maybe measure the conductivity of the "pure" water after removing the coil at the end.
 
  • #10
To keep things simple, assume that nothing is absorbed and that the material and water stay separate. In that case, the water would be a resister in parallel with the material. Consider the two extremes. If the material is an excellent conductor, the current through water can probably be ignored. On the other hand, if the material is an insulator, the current through the material can probably be ignored. In less extreme cases, you can probably use the formula for parallel resisters.

PS. If there is absorption, the situation is more complicated. Damp soil is a better conductor than dry soil. Water in the soil is a better conductor than air.
 
Back
Top