Does the slope increase if it goes from more to less negative?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on linearizing the equation y = Ae^{-\frac{b}{2m}t} by taking the natural logarithm, resulting in t = -\frac{2m}{b} ln(y) + \frac{2m}{b} ln(A). When the parameter b is increased, the slope of the linearized equation becomes less negative, indicating a decrease in the absolute value of the slope. Additionally, the intercept of the equation decreases as b increases. Participants clarify the interpretation of the slope change, debating whether it should be viewed as decreasing or simply becoming less negative. Overall, the relationship between b, slope, and intercept is the primary focus of the discussion.
Ryker
Messages
1,080
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Linearize the equation

y = Ae^{-\frac{b}{2m}t},

so that lny is the x variable and t is the y-variable. What happens to the slope and the intercept if you increase b?

The Attempt at a Solution


Taking ln of both sides, I get the equation

t = -\frac{2m}{b} \ln y + \frac{2m}{b} \ln A.

If you increase b, then the slope goes from more negative to less negative, whereas the intercept decreases. Is this correct or do you take the slope to be decreasing, because its absolute value decreases?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ryker said:

Homework Statement


Linearize the equation

y = Ae^{-\frac{b}{2m}t},

so that lny is the x variable and t is the y-variable. What happens to the slope and the intercept if you increase b?

The Attempt at a Solution


Taking ln of both sides, I get the equation

t = -\frac{2m}{b} \lny + \frac{2m}{b} \lnA.

If you increase b, then the slope goes from more negative to less negative, whereas the intercept decreases. Is this correct or do you take the slope to be decreasing, because its absolute value decreases?

That's t=0 .

\ln(y) = \ln(A) -\frac{b}{2m}\,t}

Solve this for t .
 
I was editing my LaTeX and you probably quoted it when it didn't show the natural logs :smile: The original post should have the proper equation.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top