Does the Speed of Light Remain Constant in All Scenarios?

etcota
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Starting at the beginning and have been having some difficulty explaining the implications of the constancy of the speed of light. Seeking confirmation that I at least have it right. For all scenarios below the observer is Bob standing in the middle of a train car moving at speed v. Bob has a pull cord connected mechanically to each end of the train car such that when he pulls the cord the time to trigger an event at each end of the train car is identical

- Scenario 1) Bob’s cord is attached to guns pointed at his head. He pulls the chords and after identical response times the guns fire . Speed of bullet from the back end of the car is v(b) + v, speed of bullet from the front end of the car is v(b) – v. Bullets hit Bob, who is moving at speed v with the train car, at the same time.
- Scenario 2) Bob’s cord is attached to a mallet that hits a gong when pulled. He pulls the cord and after identical response times the gongs sound. Speed of sound from back of train is v(s) +v, speed of sound from front of train is v(s) – v. Sound reaches Bob, who is moving at speed v with the train, at the same time.
- Scenario 3) Bob’s cord is attached to flashlights pointed at him. He pulls the cord and after identical response times the flashlights turn on. Speed of light from the back of train is c and speed of light from front of train is c. Bob, moving at speed v with the train car sees the light from the front of the car first.

Is this the gist of it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
etcota said:
Starting at the beginning and have been having some difficulty explaining the implications of the constancy of the speed of light. Seeking confirmation that I at least have it right. For all scenarios below the observer is Bob standing in the middle of a train car moving at speed v. Bob has a pull cord connected mechanically to each end of the train car such that when he pulls the cord the time to trigger an event at each end of the train car is identical

- Scenario 1) Bob’s cord is attached to guns pointed at his head. He pulls the chords and after identical response times the guns fire . Speed of bullet from the back end of the car is v(b) + v, speed of bullet from the front end of the car is v(b) – v. Bullets hit Bob, who is moving at speed v with the train car, at the same time.
- Scenario 2) Bob’s cord is attached to a mallet that hits a gong when pulled. He pulls the cord and after identical response times the gongs sound. Speed of sound from back of train is v(s) +v, speed of sound from front of train is v(s) – v. Sound reaches Bob, who is moving at speed v with the train, at the same time.
- Scenario 3) Bob’s cord is attached to flashlights pointed at him. He pulls the cord and after identical response times the flashlights turn on. Speed of light from the back of train is c and speed of light from front of train is c. Bob, moving at speed v with the train car sees the light from the front of the car first.

Is this the gist of it?
No, Bob will see the light from both ends of the train at the same time.

As far as the train and the air in the train and all the items in the train and Bob, traveling at v along the tracks is identical to being stationary on the tracks.

If you set up your scenarios in the Inertial Reference Frame (IRF) of the train and then used the Lorentz Transformation to transform them to the IRF of the tracks, you would find that the Coordinate Times and Distances would all be different, but it wouldn't change what Bob experiences.
 
etcota said:
He pulls the chords and after identical response times the guns fire .

...

He pulls the cord and after identical response times the gongs sound.

...

He pulls the cord and after identical response times the flashlights turn on.

"Identical response times" with respect to which frame? Bob's frame (the train frame) or the stationary frame? This is the key thing that makes the difference.

If, as I suspect, you mean "identical response times with respect to Bob's frame", then, as ghwellsjr pointed out, all three pairs of things arrive at Bob at the same time (where here, "time" is unambiguous because both items in the pair are at the same point in space as well): the pair of bullets, the pair of sounds, and the pair of light rays.

In fact, all of your reasoning involving the speed v of the train is irrelevant in this case, because, as ghwellsjr pointed out, as far as Bob and the bullets and sounds and light rays are concerned, Bob's frame is the "stationary" frame, and the fact that the train happens to be moving relative to the ground doesn't come into it.
 
Thank you both for your responses. Got it now.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
42
Views
735
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
111
Views
9K
Replies
83
Views
8K
Back
Top