Does there need to be a difference in pressure for a fluid to accelerate?

AI Thread Summary
A difference in pressure is not always necessary for a fluid to accelerate, as demonstrated by Torricelli's result where velocity changes without a pressure difference. Acceleration in fluids can result from various forces, including pressure differences or momentum transfer. Bernoulli's equation illustrates energy conservation in fluid dynamics, indicating that changes in kinetic energy must be balanced by changes in potential energy. It is crucial to understand that acceleration and momentum are vector quantities, meaning changes in direction also contribute to force generation. Overall, the relationship between pressure and fluid acceleration is complex and not solely dependent on pressure differences.
miaou5
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
From some of the questions I'm encountering my text, it seems like the writers are implying that there always needs to be a difference in pressure for a fluid to accelerate (by this I mean a difference between the Pi and Pf values on either side of Bernoulli's equation). But is this really true? For instance, in Toricelli's result, the velocity(f) is different from the velocity(i), but the Pi and Pf values are the same. Thus the fluid has experienced a change in velocity, but there is no difference in pressure. Am I misunderstanding this concept? Thank you all so much in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Good morning, miaou5 and welcome to Physics Forums.

There is always a force associated with an acceleration

Force = mass x acceleration = rate of change of momentum (Newton 2)

This force can arise in many ways. In the case of fluid motion it arises from pressure difference or momentum transfer.

Don't forget that acceleration and momentum are a vector quantities so change of direction qualifies for the generation of force as well as change of magnitude.

Bernoulli's equation is a statement of energy conservation. In the absence of an external agent energy is constant. This is often measured as 'pressure head' (a measure of potential energy).

In this form B states that the sum of the pressure heads due to static potential energy, gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy are constant for a given parcel of fluid.
So if the fluid accelerates The kinetic head increases and one or both of the other two decrease.

I do not know what Pi and Pf are, you should always predefine your symbols before using them.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top