Does thermal radiation occur within a material?

Wisco52
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I am doing an assignment with multiple heat transfers, and have to investigate the effects of including thermal radiation vs saying that thermal radiation is negligible. I know that the equation for thermal radiation is

q = A*σ*(T14 - T24) (*)

In my case the equation is slightly more complicated since I am looking at concentric cylinders, but the equation itself is not what I am hung up on.

Homework Equations


I know that radiation will occur between two black/grey bodies. If there are two metal plates near each others, and one is hot, the heat will radiate to the cold plate using the relationship above. What I am unsure of is whether thermal radiation occurs within a material itself. As in, should one apply eqn (*) in a scenario where there is only one metal plate, and one wants to look at the temperature difference across that individual plate.

The Attempt at a Solution


I currently think that one does not account for radiation within a single material, as most of the literature/textbooks I have looked at describe thermal radiation between two black/grey bodies. I have not learned about thermal radiation in my classes though before, so I am not confident in making this assumption.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top