Does this involve calculus? im confused help please

  • Thread starter Thread starter pringless
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculus Confused
AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies that calculus is not necessary to solve the problem of finding the distance of closest approach between two objects moving along the x-axis. The positions of the objects are given as functions of time, and the difference between these functions can be expressed as a quadratic equation. By graphing the two equations and their difference, one can visually identify the point of closest approach, which corresponds to the minimum value of the difference. The method involves determining the coefficients of the quadratic to find the vertex, representing the time and position of closest approach. Understanding the graphical representation is key to solving the problem effectively.
pringless
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
Hint: x_1 and x_2 never have the same value. The x-coordinates of two objects moving along the x-axis are given below as a function of time t. x_1 = (4m/s)t x_2 = -(25m) + (8m/s)t - (2m/s^2)t^2 Calculate the magnitude of the distance of closest approach of the two objects.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi pringless,
no, you do not need calculus to solve this.
Let's call x(t) = x1(t) - x2(t).
This is just quadratic in t (the graph is a parabola).
All you got to do is find the lowest (or highest) point of the parabola.
Let's call that point (t0, x0), then we can write
x(t) = a(t - t0)2 + x0.
You can find a, t0, x0 by matching the coefficients on both sides. OK?
 
im sorry...i don't really understand what u mean
 
Pringless,

Graph the two equations. That will show you position of each particle as a function of time.

If you then subtract one from the other, you'll have the difference between the two. If you graph that, you'll see the difference as a function of time. You'll see that it will go down and then go back up. The closest approach is where the difference is the smallest.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top