Does Time Delay Affect the Curl of an Electric Field?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between the time delay in the propagation of electric fields and the curl of the electric field, particularly in the context of charged particles in motion. Participants explore theoretical implications, calculation methods, and the nature of electromagnetic fields.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether the time delay in the electric field due to the motion of a charged particle contributes additional "curliness" to the electric field.
  • Another participant argues that the "retarded" time is merely a calculation method and does not imply a cause-and-effect relationship affecting the curl of the electric field.
  • There is a suggestion that the instantaneous rate of change of the magnetic field is what determines the curl of the electric field, rather than the time delay itself.
  • A participant proposes considering a charge moving in a circle and questions if the retarded time adds a curl to the electric field in that scenario.
  • Concerns are raised about the implications of the retarded time on the appearance of the electric field, suggesting that it alters the field's characteristics at any given moment.
  • One participant emphasizes that the electric field must differ when accounting for retarded time, as it would not be present instantaneously without it.
  • Another participant introduces the idea that the electric field and magnetic field components are part of a single electromagnetic field, challenging the notion that one generates the other.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the role of retarded time in relation to the curl of the electric field. There is no consensus on whether the time delay contributes to the curl or if it is merely an artifact of calculation methods.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference specific scenarios, such as a charge moving in a circle and the behavior of a rotating dipole, to illustrate their points. The discussion includes complex ideas about the nature of electromagnetic fields and the implications of different calculation methods.

ngendler
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
I am thinking about the curl of the electric field and want to make sure I have something straight:

Say you have a charged particle moving along some prescribed path. The electric field propagates outward at speed c, leading to a "retarded" time that you need to calculate in order to get the true electric field at any point.

My question: Of course, in this scenario, the curl of E will not be zero due to the changing magnetic field produced. But will there be an additional "curliness" due to including the time-delay of the field?

Thanks in advance(d time)! (har har)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The "retarded " etc is just a calculation method - not cause and effect.

The instantaneous rate rate of change of the magnetic field tells you the curl of the electric field.

As a known charge travels on some path, then an observer someplace will observe a time varying electric field.
This means the observer will use the time rate of change of the electric field to work out the curl of the resulting magnetic field (we know the charge, remember).
But the whole thing is together at the same time part of the same phenomenon.

You may want to consider the imaginary case of a charge that suddenly shifts position a bit to see how it works out.
i.e. ##x(t)=(h(t)-h(t-\delta t))vt : h(t)## is the heaviside step.
 
That makes sense.

However, in the case of, say, a charge moving in a circle--taking into consideration the retarded time points part of the electric field in the direction of motion at any given moment. Doesn't this add a curl to the field?
 
The "retarded" part of the calculation is not cause and effect - it's an artifact of the method chosen to do the calculation.
If you did not do that, then you'd have to chose another method to do the calculation or get a result that does not look much like reality.
The time delay does not cause the curl.

You don't like my example?
Try doing the math for a rotating dipole, with the observer a long way away.
What is the physical phenomena that gives the curliness?
 
It's not cause and effect, but it certainly changes what the field looks like at any given time...

Can you explain why my circling charge has a component of the field in the direction of motion?
 
Because it is accelerating.

The method of calculation changes what numbers you get out the other end - it makes no difference to Nature.
 
Ah, okay! Thanks.
 
But my computer simulation doesn't know about the electric field generated by the magnetic field... All it knows is that E=q \vec{r}/ r^3
 
Also, in any case the electric field must be different! Without the retarded time, the electric field around a charge that appears is there instantaneously--with it, there is no electric field for a short amount of time.
 
  • #10
I think the confusion is that you think the electric field (or part of it?) is "generated" by the magnetic field. This is a point of view you can sometimes read, but it's quite misleading, because it's complicating things. It leads to an apparently non-local description of electrodynamics, which in fact is the paradigmatic example for a local classical relativistic field theory.

The sources of the electromagnetic field (it's one field, which has electric and magnetic field components, and the split into electric and magnetic components is frame dependent) are the charge and current densities. Have a look at "Jefimenko's equation".
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 73 ·
3
Replies
73
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
49K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K