Does time period of SHM vary with frame(inertial and non inertial)?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether the time period of simple harmonic motion (SHM) differs for observers in inertial and non-inertial frames. It concludes that, under non-relativistic speeds, both observers perceive the same time period because their clocks run at similar rates. However, the nature of the observation can affect the perceived frequency, especially if the non-inertial observer experiences varying acceleration. The complexity increases when considering different types of oscillators, such as mechanical versus electrical systems. Overall, the time period remains consistent for both observers in this specific scenario.
vkash
Messages
316
Reaction score
1
Does time period of SHM vary with frame(inertial and non inertial)??

Homework Statement



There is an SHM. First observer is watching it from inertial frame of refrence and secodn is from non inertial will there any change of time period for both observer.

Homework Equations



just think about it.

The Attempt at a Solution



I have done a question on SHM. that was solved example first i do that with my self with non inertial frame of reference and then when i see it in book it was done by inertial frame. However my answer was matching with answer of the book.

After i think on it. I come to conclusion that speed is not too fast so clock of both observer run with same speed hence both observers will see it with same time period..
thanks..
waiting for your response.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


So... we're assuming non-relativistic speeds, and the question is whether two observers (one being accelerated) will see the same frequency for the SHM oscillator? One important thing is whether the acceleration of the observer is constant with time or not.
 


BruceW said:
So... we're assuming non-relativistic speeds, and the question is whether two observers (one being accelerated) will see the same frequency for the SHM oscillator? One important thing is whether the acceleration of the observer is constant with time or not.[/color]

consider both the cases.then??
 


hmm. For a physical object oscillating in space, you need to say what you mean by the period of oscillation, because from the point of view of the accelerated observer, the oscillator might never repeat its motion.

For some more abstract oscillator like an electrical circuit, it is more simple. In this case, I think you were right that:
vkash said:
After i think on it. I come to conclusion that speed is not too fast so clock of both observer run with same speed hence both observers will see it with same time period..
 


Also depends on what "watching" means precisely. "Observing" sound waves might not be the same as "watching" a pendulum.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top