Does Traveling Through a Wormhole Violate the Law of Conservation of Mass?

AI Thread Summary
Traveling through a wormhole does not violate the Law of Conservation of Mass, as the mass of an object entering one wormhole is balanced by a corresponding change in mass at the exit wormhole. When an object passes through, the mass of the wormhole it enters increases, while the mass of the wormhole it exits decreases by the same amount. This concept allows for the possibility of time travel without breaching fundamental physical laws. Additionally, wormholes can connect different points in time and space, but they remain within our universe. Any observed discrepancies in mass or energy would necessitate a reevaluation of current scientific theories.
permapoop
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
I'm going to apologize now if what I say doesn't really make sense, I'm still only learning the basics of physics.

Let's say that few hundred or maybe thousands of years, we developed some sort of device that can rip a hole into the space time fabric to create a wormhole. If a spaceship, satellite, or anything goes through that wormhole, wouldn't that object(s) technically not be in our dimension/realm anymore? Therefore, wouldn't that violate the Law of Conservation of Mass? Or if it doesn't violate it, how come?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
If you could build a pair of connected wormholes going through one would lead you to come out of the other. You would not leave the universe.

Interestingly you can build a time machine with two wormholes. If you accelerate one up close to the speed of light, let it fly for a while and bring it back it will be a gateway to the future for the other one. If you fixed the wormholes to walls with a synchronised clock on them the clocks will always tick at the same speed and show the same time. However the one that was accelerated to close to the speed of light will have undergone time dilation.

If the accelerated one (A) went on a 30 year journey (according to some one on Earth) that took just 10 years according to it's clock then the other wormhole (B) would be separated from it by 20 years. If you step into A you come out 20 years in the past out of B and vis versa.

This doesn't break the conservation of mass however (until yesterday I thought it might until it was [post=3266979] explained to me[/post]) because when X mass enters one wormhole it increases the wormhole by X mass and decreases the wormhole it comes out of by X mass.

So if wormhole A and B mass 1000kg and I (massing 100kg) walk through A I have transferred 100kg from the future to the past. However A will now mass 1100kg and B will mass 900kg.
 
permapoop said:
I'm going to apologize now if what I say doesn't really make sense, I'm still only learning the basics of physics.

Let's say that few hundred or maybe thousands of years, we developed some sort of device that can rip a hole into the space time fabric to create a wormhole. If a spaceship, satellite, or anything goes through that wormhole, wouldn't that object(s) technically not be in our dimension/realm anymore? Therefore, wouldn't that violate the Law of Conservation of Mass? Or if it doesn't violate it, how come?

A wormhole would lead to another part of the universe, but it would still be IN our universe. But, if something happened where we observed matter or energy dissappearing or appearing from something that couldn't be explained by anything other than other dimensions/universes, we would have to change our theories.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This hypothesis of scientists about the origin of the mysterious signal WOW seems plausible only on a superficial examination. In fact, such a strong coherent radiation requires a powerful initiating factor, and the hydrogen atoms in the cloud themselves must be in an overexcited state in order to respond instantly. If the density of the initiating radiation is insufficient, then the atoms of the cloud will not receive it at once, some will receive it earlier, and some later. But then there...

Similar threads

Back
Top