Doing free body diagram

  • Thread starter primarygun
  • Start date
  • #1
primarygun
233
0
When we do free body diagram, we usually consider the vector as scalar.
I think this is a very important point, but why my teacher didn't clarify a lot?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
arildno
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
10,089
135
primarygun said:
When we do free body diagram, we usually consider the vector as scalar.
I think this is a very important point, but why my teacher didn't clarify a lot?
No, we don't.
What you might be thinking of, is that we often write the vector as a MAGNITUDE (a non-negative scalar quantity) multiplied with a DIRECTION (a unit vector)
The direction is, of course, "readily" seen from the diagram.
 
  • #3
Doc Al
Mentor
45,450
1,911
primarygun said:
When we do free body diagram, we usually consider the vector as scalar.
When you do a free body diagram, you are isolating a particular object and showing all the forces acting on it. These forces are certainly vectors, usually depicted as arrows in the diagram. What makes you think you are treating them as scalars?
 
  • #4
primarygun
233
0
Note: Forces in x-axis are 5N and -5N. Find the acceleration.
My teacher would suggest us to
F=ma
5N-5N=ma
Hence, a=0.
The equation is the same,though, he never tells us 5N+(-5N)
 
  • #5
dextercioby
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
13,256
1,318
Forces are vectors.Period.The laws of Newton must be written in vector form...ALWAYS.
In your example,what if one of the forces would act as to make an angle (different from 0 or pi) with the direction of the other force...?

Daniel.
 
  • #6
jtbell
Mentor
15,946
4,616
primarygun said:
Note: Forces in x-axis are 5N and -5N. Find the acceleration.
My teacher would suggest us to
F=ma
5N-5N=ma
Hence, a=0.
The equation is the same,though, he never tells us 5N+(-5N)

It would make things more explicit to write out all the steps like this:

[tex] \bold F_{net} = m \bold a [/tex]

[tex] {\bold F}_1 + {\bold F}_2 = m \bold a [/tex]

[tex] F_{1x} + F_{2x} = m a_x [/tex]

[tex] (+5N) + (-5N) = m a_x [/tex]

[tex] 5N - 5N = m a_x [/tex]

[tex] 0 = m a_x [/tex]

[tex] 0 = a_x [/tex]

And of course if the y-components of the forces are zero, then [tex]a_y[/tex] is zero also, so [tex] \bold a [/tex] (the vector) equals zero.

But nobody ever actually writes out all those steps, in practice. I might do it that way once, when teaching it, just to clarify things.
 
  • #7
dextercioby
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
13,256
1,318
The way the problem is actually posted,it says nothing about an accelereration (or simply a nonzero velocity) in the "y" direction,so even if you come up with the conclusion that a_{x}=0,you still wouldn't tell how that body's moving.

Daniel.
 

Suggested for: Doing free body diagram

  • Last Post
3
Replies
76
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
460
Replies
6
Views
352
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
32
Views
5K
Replies
38
Views
864
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
0
Views
274
Replies
2
Views
272
Top