Doing free body diagram

  • Thread starter primarygun
  • Start date
  • #1
232
0
When we do free body diagram, we usually consider the vector as scalar.
I think this is a very important point, but why my teacher didn't clarify a lot?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
arildno
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
10,025
134
primarygun said:
When we do free body diagram, we usually consider the vector as scalar.
I think this is a very important point, but why my teacher didn't clarify a lot?
No, we don't.
What you might be thinking of, is that we often write the vector as a MAGNITUDE (a non-negative scalar quantity) multiplied with a DIRECTION (a unit vector)
The direction is, of course, "readily" seen from the diagram.
 
  • #3
Doc Al
Mentor
45,204
1,540
primarygun said:
When we do free body diagram, we usually consider the vector as scalar.
When you do a free body diagram, you are isolating a particular object and showing all the forces acting on it. These forces are certainly vectors, usually depicted as arrows in the diagram. What makes you think you are treating them as scalars?
 
  • #4
232
0
Note: Forces in x-axis are 5N and -5N. Find the acceleration.
My teacher would suggest us to
F=ma
5N-5N=ma
Hence, a=0.
The equation is the same,though, he never tells us 5N+(-5N)
 
  • #5
dextercioby
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
13,147
708
Forces are vectors.Period.The laws of Newton must be written in vector form...ALWAYS.
In your example,what if one of the forces would act as to make an angle (different from 0 or pi) with the direction of the other force...?

Daniel.
 
  • #6
jtbell
Mentor
15,816
4,097
primarygun said:
Note: Forces in x-axis are 5N and -5N. Find the acceleration.
My teacher would suggest us to
F=ma
5N-5N=ma
Hence, a=0.
The equation is the same,though, he never tells us 5N+(-5N)

It would make things more explicit to write out all the steps like this:

[tex] \bold F_{net} = m \bold a [/tex]

[tex] {\bold F}_1 + {\bold F}_2 = m \bold a [/tex]

[tex] F_{1x} + F_{2x} = m a_x [/tex]

[tex] (+5N) + (-5N) = m a_x [/tex]

[tex] 5N - 5N = m a_x [/tex]

[tex] 0 = m a_x [/tex]

[tex] 0 = a_x [/tex]

And of course if the y-components of the forces are zero, then [tex]a_y[/tex] is zero also, so [tex] \bold a [/tex] (the vector) equals zero.

But nobody ever actually writes out all those steps, in practice. I might do it that way once, when teaching it, just to clarify things.
 
  • #7
dextercioby
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
13,147
708
The way the problem is actually posted,it says nothing about an accelereration (or simply a nonzero velocity) in the "y" direction,so even if you come up with the conclusion that a_{x}=0,you still wouldn't tell how that body's moving.

Daniel.
 

Related Threads on Doing free body diagram

  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
9
Views
976
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • Last Post
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
918
  • Last Post
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
9K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
894
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
6K
Top