Doppler Effect of a 1-kilohertz sound

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the observed frequency of a 1-kilohertz sound emitted from a source moving towards the observer at 0.9 times the speed of sound. The initial attempt at using the formula resulted in an incorrect frequency of 1.9 times the emitted frequency. The correct approach involves recognizing that the radial component of the source's velocity should be treated as negative in the Doppler effect formula, which accounts for the increase in frequency due to the source moving towards the observer. Participants clarify that the formula used initially was more suited for a moving listener rather than a moving source. The key takeaway is understanding the sign conventions in the Doppler effect equations to arrive at the correct observed frequency.
Fanaticus
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A source of 1-kilohertz sound is moving straight toward you at a speed .9 times the speed of sound. The frequency you receive is:


Homework Equations



\nu = \frac{v}{\lambda}

f' = \frac{v + v'}{v} f



The Attempt at a Solution



When I attempt the solution I get f' = \frac{v + .9v}{v} f = 1.9 f. However, that is not correct. The answer is 10 f. What am I missing?

Thx
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your sign on the relative velocity probably. You could also work on the algebra that let you change f'=1.9*f into f=1.9*f'. That doesn't seem right either.
 
Well, the source is moving toward you. So the direction of the sound and the source should have the same sign. I don't know. I am missing something small I am sure, because this is a GRE question so it shouldn't take long to solve.
 
The formula I've got is f'=f*v/(v+vr). f' is observed frequency, f is emitted frequency. vr is radial component of source velocity. v is speed of sound. If it's moving towards you, you want an increase in frequency. That mean vr should be negative to make numerator larger than denominator.
 
Ok, thx. The formula I was using seems to be for a moving listener not a moving source.

I see how you justify making the vr negative. However it still seems odd since vr and v are going in the same direction, know what I mean?
 
v is the speed of sound. It's isn't going in any particular direction. vr is coming towards you. Apparently according to the conventions of that formula that makes vr negative.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top