Dot Product confusion (no calculations involved)

AI Thread Summary
The dot product of two vectors A and B is calculated as AxBx + AyBy + AzBz, which can yield a negative result if the angle between the vectors exceeds 90 degrees. This negative value does not imply a negative magnitude, as magnitude is always positive for non-zero vectors. The squared magnitude of a vector is obtained by taking the dot product of the vector with itself, ensuring a positive outcome. Understanding the relationship between the dot product and the angle between vectors clarifies the confusion surrounding negative results. The discussion effectively resolves misconceptions about the nature of dot products and magnitudes.
LearninDaMath
Messages
295
Reaction score
0
If I take the Dot Product of two vectors, say A and B, I get: AxBx + AyBy + AzBz

And then when I add those terms, I get the magnitude, right?

So when one of those terms are negative, that means I could end up with a negative magnitude?

I thought magnitude had to be positive.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You get the squared magnitude of a vector if you take the dot product of that vector with itself.
This is always positive (for a non-zero vector).

A dot product between 2 different vectors can be negative.
This indicates that the angle between the vectors is greater than 90 degrees.
 
I like Serena said:
You get the squared magnitude of a vector if you take the dot product of that vector with itself.
This is always positive (for a non-zero vector).

A dot product between 2 different vectors can be negative.
This indicates that the angle between the vectors is greater than 90 degrees.

Thanks I like Serena, this cleared up the confusion.
 
Cheers! :smile:
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top