Double integration problem for IDSFT

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kurd
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integration
Kurd
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


[/B]
The 2D Discrete Space Fourier transform (DSFT) X(w1,w2) of the sequence x(n1,n2) is given by,

$$X(w_1,w_2) = 5 + 2j sin(w_2) + cos(w_1) + 2e^{(-jw1-jw2)}$$

determine x(n1,n2)

Homework Equations



By definition inverse DSFT is,

$$x(n_1,n_2) = \dfrac{1}{(2π)^2} \int_{-π}^{π}\int_{-π}^{π} X(w_1,w_2) e^{(jw_1n_1+jw_2n_2)} dw_1dw_2$$

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
I got zero as a final answer.

Solving the double integral for each term I get zero when substituting pi, is it correct or did I made a mistake somewhere, what gets me confused is that when doing DSFT for some simple problem I can get cos(w1) for example but if I did the inverse DSFT I will get zero. can someone help.

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Kurd said:
I got zero as a final answer
Please post your working.
 
  • Like
Likes Kurd
Taking each term,

$$X_1(w_1,w_2) = 5$$
$$X_2(w_1,w_2) = 2jsin(w_2)$$
$$X_3(w_1,w_2) = cos(w_1)$$
$$X_4(w1,w2) = 2e^{(-jw_1-jw_2)}$$

then,

$$ x_1(n_1,n_2) = \dfrac{5}{(2π)^2} \int_{-π}^{π}\int_{-π}^{π} e^{jw_1n_1+jw_2n_2} dw_1dw_2$$
$$x_1(n_1,n_2) = \dfrac{5}{(2π)^2} \int_{-π}^{π}e^{jw_2n_2}[ \int_{-π}^{π} e^{jw_1n_1} dw_1]dw_2$$
$$x_1(n_1,n_2) = \dfrac{5}{(2π)^2} \int_{-π}^{π}e^{jw_2n_2} [\dfrac{e^{jw_1n_1}}{jn_1}]_{-π}^{π} dw_2$$
$$x_1(n_1,n_2) = \dfrac{5}{(2π)^2} \int_{-π}^{π}e^{jw_2n_2} [\dfrac{1}{jn_1}(e^{jπn_n1} - e^{-jπn_1})] dw_2$$

since n1 and n2 are discrete, then
$$(e^{jπn_1} - e^{-jπn_1})] = cos(jπn_1) + jsin(jπn_1) - cos(-jπn_1) + jsin(-jπn_1) = 0$$

I solved the remaining terms in a similar fashion, do you find anything wrong here.
 
Ok I got it.

I didn't notice that

$$\dfrac{sin(πn_1)}{πn_1}$$

which is a sinc function and equals 1 at n1 = 0.
 
Kurd said:
Ok I got it.

I didn't notice that

$$\dfrac{sin(πn_1)}{πn_1}$$

which is a sinc function and equals 1 at n1 = 0.
Well done.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top