Double Slit, different wavelengths change in X

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the distance between the third-order fringes of red and yellow-green light in a double-slit experiment. The user initially calculated the positions of the fringes using the formula for constructive interference but found discrepancies with the expected answers from the textbook. It was clarified that the 28 mm figure refers to the displacement of the red fringe, not the separation between the two colored fringes. Additionally, there was skepticism about the textbook's answer for a second problem involving different wavelengths. Overall, the calculations were deemed correct, but minor round-off errors affected the final results.
rss14
Messages
38
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Two slits are 0.158mm apart. A mixture of red light (wavelength = 665nm) and yellow-green light (wavelength = 565nm) fall onto the slits. A screen is located 2.2m away. Find the distance between the third-order red fringe and the third-order yellow-green fringe.


Homework Equations



Since they ask for colored fringes, and not dark ones, it must be constructive interference.

x/L = (m*λ/ d)

x = 0.000158m
L = 2.2m
m = 3 (third order fringe)

λ of red = 6.65E-7m
λ of yellow-green = 5.65E-7m

The Attempt at a Solution



I did the equation twice, once for each wavelength.

For red I got x as 2.7E-2m, and for yellow-green i got x as 2.36E-2m.

The difference between these 2 values is 0.0034mm or 3.4mm.

The answer however, is supposed to be 28mm. . .


How was I supposed to do this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here is another question, similar concept.

Light of wavelengths 480nm and 632nm passes through two slits 0.52mm apart. How far apart are the second-order fringes on a screen 1.6m away?
 
rss14 said:
For red I got x as 2.7E-2m, and for yellow-green i got x as 2.36E-2m.

x for red is slightly off. Can you express the answer with one more decimal place of accuracy? I.e., 2.7_ e-2 m.

You're already in the right ballpark. I disagree with the 28 mm answer, who or what told you that is the answer?
 
The textbook says that in the back.

Also, the second question I posted has an answer of 7cm, according to the book.
 
I am going to bump this thread, hopefully my question will be answered before my test tomorrow.
 
You have the correct approach, but you had some round-off error in the first problem.

Both book answers are wrong. For the 1st question, 28 mm is the displacement of the 665 nm, 3rd-order fringe, not the separation of the two colored fringes.

Not sure where they got 7 cm for the 2nd problem.

Good luck on the test.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top