Double Slit Interference (nonzero slit width)

TOD
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A mask with 2 slits is illuminated by a light of 589nm wavelength. Slits each have a 0.1mm width separated (centre to centre) by 3.0mm. Calculate the distance between adjacent bright fringes on the screen if a screen is placed 5.0m away from the slits.


Homework Equations


Where

\beta=2\pidsin\theta/\lambda

\phi=2\piasin\theta/\lambda

d=slit separation
a=slit width

E=E(max)cos\frac{\phi}{2}*(\frac{sin(\beta/2)}{\beta/2})

(sorry, no good with this latex stuff, some stuff not showing right)

The Attempt at a Solution


First, I assume that if given a slit width of some size then we cannot assume that the interference comes from points sources. So to calculate the distance between adjacent bright fringes, I took on the formula for intensity and turned it into electric field of some form (just square rooted) and tried to differentiate the electric field and then find the roots of the equation. However I have found this extremely lengthy and most probably unnecessary. Can anyone get me started in the correct direction?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Treat the problem as the superposition of two diffraction patterns, one from each 0.1 mm slit. Where a bright fringe from one source occupies the same position as the other source's bright fringe this is a bright fringe of the double slit system.
 
TOD said:

Homework Equations


Where

\beta=2\pidsin\theta/\lambda

\phi=2\piasin\theta/\lambda
Looks like you have φ and β switched around here, given your expression for E below.

d=slit separation
a=slit width

E=E(max)cos\frac{\phi}{2}*(\frac{sin(\beta/2)}{\beta/2})

Okay. And what must
cos(φ/2) = cos[π d sin(θ) / λ ]

be equal to, for a bright intensity fringe to occur?
 
Redbelly98 said:
Looks like you have φ and β switched around here, given your expression for E below.

Ah yes, my bad.


Okay. And what must
cos(φ/2) = cos[π d sin(θ) / λ ]

be equal to, for a bright intensity fringe to occur?

Plus or minus one? So I could in theory get that thing to equal 1, but that doesn't mean the product of this and the sine of a sine function is maximum does it?
 
Redbelly98 said:
Okay. And what must
cos(φ/2) = cos[π d sin(θ) / λ ]

be equal to, for a bright intensity fringe to occur?


TOD said:
Plus or minus one?
Yes, exactly.

TOD said:
So I could in theory get that thing to equal 1, but that doesn't mean the product of this and the sine of a sine function is maximum does it?
That's a good question. The answer, in practice, is yes it does. Since measurements of fringe spacing are typically done near the central axis, where
sin(β/2) / (β/2) ≈ 1,​
the effect of the sin(β/2) term can be ignored.

Or put another way, the cos(φ/2) term oscillates many many times for each oscillation of the sin(β/2) term. This is because d and φ are much larger than a and β, respectively. (In the present case they are 30 times larger.)

Hope that helps.
 
Redbelly98 said:
Yes, exactly.


That's a good question. The answer, in practice, is yes it does. Since measurements of fringe spacing are typically done near the central axis, where
sin(β/2) / (β/2) ≈ 1,​
the effect of the sin(β/2) term can be ignored.

Or put another way, the cos(φ/2) term oscillates many many times for each oscillation of the sin(β/2) term. This is because d and φ are much larger than a and β, respectively. (In the present case they are 30 times larger.)

Hope that helps.

Very interesting. Thanks for the help.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top