Double Slit Interference Question

AI Thread Summary
Light of wavelength 680 nm creates an interference pattern with the fourth-order fringe located 38 mm from the central fringe on a screen 2.0 m away. The equation used to find the slit separation is x = L(λ/d), leading to the calculation of d. The user initially calculated d as 1.4 x 10^-4 m but included a typo in their equation. After clarification, it was confirmed that the approach was correct, with the typo being the only issue. The discussion emphasizes the importance of careful equation setup in solving interference problems.
iurod
Messages
51
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Light of wavelength 680 nm falls on two slits and produces an interference pattern in which thefourth-order fringe is 38 mm from the central fringe on a screen 2.0 m away. What is the separationof the two slits?

Homework Equations


Sintheta=2m(\lambda2d)

x=L(\lambda/d



The Attempt at a Solution



My givens are:
\lambda= 680nm
L= 2.0m
x438mm

using equation x=L(\lambda/d I got:

0.038 = 2.0m(680 x 10-9(4)/d)
d=2.0m(680 x 10-9(4)/d)/0.038)= 1.4x10-4m

Am I doing this correctly?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
iurod said:
I got:

0.038 = 2.0m(680 x 10-9(4)/d)
d=2.0m(680 x 10-9(4)/d)/0.038)= 1.4x10-4m

Am I doing this correctly?
That's how I did it. :approve:
 
iurod said:
I got:

0.038 = 2.0m(680 x 10-9(4)/d)
d=2.0m(680 x 10-9(4)/d)/0.038)= 1.4x10-4m
Oh, except you left the "/d" in there. But I'm guessing that's just a typo. :smile:
 
Last edited:
Thanks! Definitely a typo, sorry about that.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top