Double Slit Question with Thin Lens concept

AI Thread Summary
In the double slit experiment with a light source of 540nm and a slit separation of 4mm, a thin glass plate with a refractive index of 1.56 is placed in front of one slit, causing the bright fringes to shift. The discussion focuses on determining the minimum thickness of the glass plate required for this fringe shift, with the relationship between thickness, wavelength, and refractive index being central to the calculations. The proposed formula for thickness is λ/(4n), leading to a calculated thickness of approximately 8.65×10^-8 m. There is some confusion regarding the movement of the bright fringes and the optical path difference, which is suggested to be equivalent to one wavelength. The conversation emphasizes the need for clarity in understanding the fringe movement and the implications of the glass plate's thickness on the interference pattern.
JohnGaltis
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider a double slit experiment with a light source of 540nm. Slit separation is 4mm. A thin glass plate is placed in front of one of the slit,, resulting in each bright fringe moving to the location of the adjacent bright fringe. Find the minimum thickness of the glass.

Refractive index of the glass is 1.56. Ignore reflections caused by the glass.

Homework Equations


2nt= +- mλ (bright fringe)
2nt= +- m+½λ (dark fringe)

The Attempt at a Solution


I think I should be using the thin lens formula since they emphasised the thin glass plate as "thin". Bright fringe moves the distance of a dark fringe to take the position of the adjacent bright fringe.

It seems too simple to just use

t= (m+½λ)/2n

Is there something I am missing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello John,

No lens. But I don't see what minimum thickness you propose. m, t, n ?

By the way, I'd like to see a drawing of the situation before and after placing the glass plate. I have difficulty understanding what exactly happens with the 1st maximum (does it move to where the 2nd was before?) Then how can the 2nd maximum move to where the 3rd was instead of to where the 4th was ?
 
BvU said:
Hello John,

No lens. But I don't see what minimum thickness you propose. m, t, n ?

By the way, I'd like to see a drawing of the situation before and after placing the glass plate. I have difficulty understanding what exactly happens with the 1st maximum (does it move to where the 2nd was before?) Then how can the 2nd maximum move to where the 3rd was instead of to where the 4th was ?
It's a conceptual question though.

mkbFoV4.jpg
 
I merely used:

Thickness= λ/4n

to obtain 8.65×10^-8 m
 
Bit thin for a glass plate, I would say...

What is the agrgument for your ##\lambda/(4n) ## ?

PS I initially misread a part. Perhaps this helps to compensate ...
 
Hmm but I don't have the distance between the slits and the wall.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
10K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top