Downhill Skier: Calculating Resultant Forces

  • Thread starter Thread starter ruzoo
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
A 60kg skier on a 30-degree slope experiences forces including gravity, air resistance of 10 Newtons, and friction with a coefficient of 0.08. The skier's weight converts to 588 N, and the vertical and horizontal components of this weight must be calculated to determine the normal force and frictional force. The normal force balances the perpendicular component of the weight, allowing for a reduction to a one-dimensional analysis along the slope. By summing the forces parallel to the slope, the resultant force acting on the skier can be determined. Understanding these components is crucial for solving the problem accurately.
ruzoo
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Please Help ASAP: Downhill Skier Question

Here is the question:

"A 60kg skier is in a tuck and moving straight down a 30 degree slope. Air resistance pushes backward on the skier with a force of 10 Newtons. The coefficient of dynamic friction between the skis and the snow is 0.08. What is the resultant of the forces that act on the skier?"

This is what I have done:

Made a right angle triangle with the hypoteneuse at a 30 degree angle and the skier coming down the hypoteneuse. Converted skier's weight into mass: 588 N. Calculated the vertical component of the triangle (5 N, which is the Fn?) and the horizontal component (8.7 N, which is the parallel force?). I drew an arrow with a force of 10 N acting parallel against the slope (hypot) acting against the skier. I am stuck as of here and how to calcultate the resulting forces.:bugeye:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
In Addition...

I was also told to try and redo this problem by making my hill or slope be the x axis...I guess draw a tilted axis diagram to make the forces opposing the skier one value...but that confused me a little.
 
First off, you converted the skier's mass into weight.

Second - when you talk about "vertical" and "horizontal", do you mean that literally or are you speaking with respect to the plane? Normally in the latter case we talk about "parallel to the plane" and "perpendicular to the plane".

I'll assume the latter is what you meant. You have the skier's weight component perpendicular to the plane - this means you know the normal force, or should. From the normal force and the coefficient of friction you can get the frictional force. You know that the normal force will cancel the perpendicular component of the weight, so you can reduce this to a one-dimensional problem, parallel to the hill. You can get the net force, then, by doing a vector sum on the forces you know - which is the answer for which you're looking.

As to your addition - I will confess I'm puzzled. If I'm reading the question correctly, then that's exactly what you'd do to answer the first one. So either I'm not reading it right or I'm missing something about the first one.

Anyway - does this help any?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top