Downward acceleration greater than g

  • Thread starter Thread starter mmfoley
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acceleration
AI Thread Summary
An object falling through the air initially accelerates at g, but as air resistance increases with speed, its acceleration decreases and eventually reaches zero at terminal velocity. It is incorrect to say that an object can have a downward acceleration greater than g while falling; only an object like a diving airplane can achieve that by adding engine force to gravity. Additionally, as one moves toward the Earth's center, gravitational attraction decreases due to the cancellation of mass above, resulting in zero gravitational pull at the center, while mass remains constant. Understanding these concepts is crucial for grasping the dynamics of falling objects and gravitational forces. The discussion highlights the importance of distinguishing between acceleration and speed in physics.
mmfoley
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I am taking a Natural and Physical Sciences course. As math and sciences aren't my strongest subjects, I am really struggling, reading things over and over again, and they are just not sinking in. For example, I understand the acceleration of gravity - g. I think that something can have a downward acceleration greater than g, - at least I think this is correct based on my notes, but I do not understand exactly how.

Would the following be accurate? – When an object first falls it is unbalanced, until the force of air resistance is large enough to balance the acceleration of gravity. So until it balances out, it is falling faster g. Since the object is falling down, this would mean that while unbalanced it has a downward acceleration greater than g.

Help!

Thank you!
mmfoley
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, you are confusing speed with acceleration!

If there were no air resistance, the object would fall with acceleration g.

With air resistance, its acceleration is always less than g.

Since air resistance is proportional to speed, initially there will be very little resistance. The acceleration will be close to g, only very slightly less. As speed increases, so will air resistance so acceleration will go down. When speed is high enough that air resistance, upward, is equal to gravitational force, downward, (weight), the acceleration is 0,not g. The speed is now constant, not the acceleration.

Acceleration of a body falling through the air is initially g, then decreases to 0. It's speed is initially 0, then increases to it "terminal velocity".
 
It is, of course, possible, to go downward with acceleration greater than g but not "falling". An airplane, diving downward with its engine force added to the force of gravity, would have acceleration greater than g.
 
Thank you - one more question

Thank you for the help. Here is another question:

How do the mass and weight of an object at the Earth's center compare with their values at the Earth's surface?

I believe that as you move closer to the Earth's center you get the gravitational attraction effect, but that is about where my knowledge runs out on this topic.
 
You posted this as a separate thread and got very good answers there but I'll reply here.

As you move down into the earth, you are attracted only by the mass below you. It's a complicated calculation but it is possible to show that the gravitational attraction of the mass above you level cancels. Yes, since gravity depends on 1/R2, as you get closer to a mass gravitational pull (of that mass) increases but since volume (and so mass) below you depends on R3 the total gravitational pull (weight) depends on R3/R2= R. When R= 0, gravitational pull is 0.

The total gravitational pull at the center of the Earth is 0 because you are pulled equally in all directions. Your "weight" will be 0. Of course, your "mass" stays the same.
 
Thank you

Thank you for the quick response and help!

mmfoley
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top