DP transmitter level indicator question

  • Thread starter Thread starter frankiee
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Transmitter
AI Thread Summary
In a tank with hot water and steam, a differential pressure (DP) transmitter measures the liquid level based on the pressure difference. When switching from heavy water (specific gravity 1.1) to light water (specific gravity 1.0), the level indication will be affected due to the change in density. The DP transmitter will likely read low with the light water unless recalibrated, as the lighter fluid results in a smaller pressure differential. The wet leg, originally biased for heavy water, will not accurately reflect the new conditions, leading to potential misreadings. Proper calibration is essential to ensure accurate level indication after such a fluid change.
frankiee
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi
this is an instrumentation and control question
A given tank has hot water process fluid in the bottom and steam as a gas on top.
It has a differential pressure transmiter level with the bottom of the tank
It has a wet leg on the low side of the d\p to control the steam condensate.
If the system was filled with heavy water (sp 1.1) originally and then the whole system was changed to normal light water (sp=1)
What would happen to the level indication if the tank had the same level with both waters?

thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
It will read low with the light water, right? Unless you re-calibrate it when you change the density of the water.
 
I don't know the answer but I was thinking it would read high
The DP wet leg would be biased out with the heavy water.
The heavy water would be replaced with lighter water and the dp cell would see more of a delta P. and therefore read more on the gauge then what the tank level really was.
I don't know the answer.
I don't know how they bias the wet leg out so I can't picture it.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
Thread 'How can I find the cleanout for my building drain?'
I am a long distance truck driver, but I recently completed a plumbing program with Stratford Career Institute. In the chapter of my textbook Repairing DWV Systems, the author says that if there is a clog in the building drain, one can clear out the clog by using a snake augur or maybe some other type of tool into the cleanout for the building drain. The author said that the cleanout for the building drain is usually near the stack. I live in a duplex townhouse. Just out of curiosity, I...
Back
Top