What is Jim Goff's hourly wage in Drilling was never too fun?

  • Thread starter Thread starter niyati
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fun
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating Jim Goff's hourly wage based on a fictional scenario where he is docked pay for time spent airborne after a premature blast. Initial calculations estimated his time in the air at approximately 18.11 seconds, leading to an unrealistic hourly wage of about $198. However, participants clarified that the average speed should be considered for accurate time calculation, suggesting the use of the equation v[final] = v[initial] + at. After adjusting the calculations, a more reasonable hourly wage of $99.40 was proposed. The conversation highlights the importance of proper physics application in solving real-world wage problems.
niyati
Messages
63
Reaction score
0
Every morning at seven o' clock
There's twenty terriers drilling on the rock.
The boss comes around and he says, "Keep still
And bear down heavy on the cast-iron drill

And drill, ye terriers, drill." And drill, ye terriers, drill.
It's work all day for sugar in your tea
Down beyond the railway. And drill, ye terriers, drill.

The foreman's name was John McAnn.
By God, he was a blamed mean man.
One day a premature blast went off
And a mile in the air when big Jim Goff. And drill...

Then when next payday came around
Jim Goff a dollar short was found.
When he asked what for, came this reply:
"You were docked for the time you were up in the sky." And drill...

What was Goff's hourly wage? State the assumptions you make in computing it.

----------
Equations are the basic three of mechanics.

If he went one mile to the sky, I assume he came back in one mile, making the total distance 2 miles, and a total displacement of zero. This problem is in a chapter that deals with motion in one dimension. I need to find the time that Goff was in the air. But I only know that a = -32.2 ft/s^2.

Using v[final]^2 = v[initial]^2 + 2as to represent only the upward journey, I got the initial velocity, with v[final] = 0, a = -32.2, and s = 5280, to be the square root of 340032, or about 583.123 ft/s. Using the velocity as a proportion to 5280 feet, it took Goff about 9.055 seconds to get to his maximum height, meaning that 18.11 seconds were spent up in the air.

For an hourly wage, I set up a another proportion; if one dollar is docked for about 18 seconds, then how many dollars would be docked for 3600 seconds?

I got about 198 dollars.

...this seems wrong. I think I did the calculations right, but the thought of someone being paid 198 dollars an hour...for mining nonetheless. I know it has nothing to do with the logic of the problem, but, is this a good way to go about the problem? Is my train of thought correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your thinking is good, but you made an error here:
niyati said:
Using v[final]^2 = v[initial]^2 + 2as to represent only the upward journey, I got the initial velocity, with v[final] = 0, a = -32.2, and s = 5280, to be the square root of 340032, or about 583.123 ft/s. Using the velocity as a proportion to 5280 feet, it took Goff about 9.055 seconds to get to his maximum height, meaning that 18.11 seconds were spent up in the air.
Realize that 583 ft/s is the initial speed of the miner and his speed is not constant. To calculate the time it takes him to rise up that mile, you'll need his average speed. (How does that relate to the initial speed?)
 
Hrm. So, could I just plug into the equation v[final] = v[initial] + at, and get that time, with v[inital] = 583 and v[final] = 0?
 
niyati said:
Hrm. So, could I just plug into the equation v[final] = v[initial] + at, and get that time, with v[inital] = 583 and v[final] = 0?
Yes: That's a perfectly fine way to calculate the time.
 
Thank you! I got a [slightly] reasonable answer of 99.40 dollars.

:)
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Back
Top