Driven Oscillation- Motion of a particle, with given equation.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the motion of a particle described by the equation x(t) = 25 cm * cos(10t) and the relationship between kinetic and potential energy. The kinetic energy is defined as twice the potential energy, leading to the equation 1/2 kA^2 = 1/2 mv^2 + mgh. Participants clarify that the "v" in the frequency equation should be represented as "nu" for cyclic frequency, and that the x and y directions are interchangeable in this context. The discussion also emphasizes the importance of consistent units in the motion equation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of harmonic motion and oscillation principles
  • Familiarity with energy conservation in mechanical systems
  • Knowledge of trigonometric functions and their applications in physics
  • Basic understanding of kinetic and potential energy equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of Driven Oscillations and resonance in physics
  • Learn about the relationship between kinetic and potential energy in oscillatory motion
  • Explore the implications of unit consistency in physics equations
  • Investigate the role of amplitude and frequency in harmonic motion
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics and oscillatory motion, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts related to energy in oscillations.

Self-Help
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Okay.. so I have tried to do this one but no luck.

Homework Equations


w= 2 * pi* v
1/2 kA^2= 1/2mv^2 + mgh


Alright so the question:

The motion of a particle is given by x(t)= 25cm* cos 10t
What time is the kinetic energy twice the potential energy?


Not sure how to use a x(t) equation to incorporate mgh which deals motion in the y direction.

Any guide would be appreciated.. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are probably just suffering from notational inconsistency/ambiguity. I suspect:

- The "v" in the equation for frequnecy is actually not a "v" at all, but rather Greek letter "nu". I.e., it is not velocity, but rather cyclic frequency. I would use "f" instead.

- The "x" and "y" directions are arbitrary. And so, while "y" is typically chosen to represent vertical position, "x" is just as well. In fact, you have "1/2 kA^2" and "mgh" in your energy equation, and "y" does not appear anywhere. I suspect: A=h=x in your equations.

- The equation of the motion of the particle has unitless time. I suspect that the "10" in the argument of the cosine should have some units.

BTW, why did you call this "Driven Oscillation"?
 
I just used the unit name, it's called Driven Oscillations and resonance.
Okay... hmm
so looking at it only with energy considerations... we have amplitude so we can do the equation:

1/2KA^2= 1/2 mv^2 + mv^2

... but mass shouldn't be included in the equation :S
so this is where I get stuck again!
lol ahhh
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
40
Views
4K
Replies
25
Views
1K