Driven Quantum harmonic oscillator by way of the S-Matrix

Henriamaa
Messages
14
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


We have the lagragian L = \frac{m}{2} \dot{x}^2 - \frac{m \omega x^2}{2} + f(t) x(t)
where f(t) = f_0 for 0 \le t \le T 0 otherwise. The only diagram that survives in the s -matrix expansion when calculating <0|S|0> is D = \int dt dt&#039; f(t)f(t&#039;) &lt;0|T x(t)x(t&#039;)|0&gt;. (This is easily seen by looking at the magnus expansion with interacting hamiltonian in the interaction picture being f(t)x(t)). Show that in frequency space D = \int d\nu \frac{-1}{4m \pi} f(-\nu) \frac{i}{\nu^2 - \omega^2 + i \epsilon} f(\nu)

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


&lt;0| T x(t)x(t&#039;)|0&gt; = \frac{1}{2m\omega}e^{i(t-t&#039;)\omega}
where x(t) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2m\omega}}(a e^{-i\omega t}+ a^{\dagger}e^{i\omega t} ). I got the result by applying wick's theorem. I assumed that t > t' and merely calculated &lt;0| [a e^{-i \omega t}, a^{\dagger}e^{i \omega t&#039;}] |0&gt; \frac{1}{2m \omega}. Now putting in all the Fourier expressions D = \frac{1}{(2 \pi)^2} \int dt dt&#039; d\nu d\nu&#039; f(\nu) e^{-i\nu t}\frac{1}{2m\omega}e^{i(t-t&#039;)\omega} e^{-i \nu&#039; t&#039; }f(\nu&#039;) . There is no need of going on because integrating out t and t' merely gives delta functions which will not give the result. The only place where I can see I have gone wrong is in calculating the VEV but then I do not know what I am doing wrong.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Henriamaa said:
&lt;0| T x(t)x(t&#039;)|0&gt; = \frac{1}{2m\omega}e^{i(t-t&#039;)\omega}
where x(t) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2m\omega}}(a e^{-i\omega t}+ a^{\dagger}e^{i\omega t} ). I got the result by applying wick's theorem. I assumed that t > t' and merely calculated &lt;0| [a e^{-i \omega t}, a^{\dagger}e^{i \omega t&#039;}] |0&gt; \frac{1}{2m \omega}.

Since we have a time ordered product, we also have to consider ##t<t'##, so you should find that
$$\langle 0| T( x(t)x(t') )|0\rangle \propto e^{i\omega|t-t'|}.$$
The absolute value has consequences below.

Now putting in all the Fourier expressions D = \frac{1}{(2 \pi)^2} \int dt dt&#039; d\nu d\nu&#039; f(\nu) e^{-i\nu t}\frac{1}{2m\omega}e^{i(t-t&#039;)\omega} e^{-i \nu&#039; t&#039; }f(\nu&#039;) . There is no need of going on because integrating out t and t' merely gives delta functions which will not give the result. The only place where I can see I have gone wrong is in calculating the VEV but then I do not know what I am doing wrong.

When you include the absolute value, we have different expressions for ##t <t'## and ##t> t'##. One way to account for this is to split the integrals
$$ \int dt dt' e^{i\omega|t-t'| - i \nu t -i \nu' t' } = \int_{-\infty}^\infty dt \left[ e^{i(\omega-\nu)t } \int_{-\infty}^t e^{-i(\omega +\nu' + i\epsilon) t'} + e^{-i(\omega+\nu)t }\int^{\infty}_t e^{i(\omega -\nu' + i\epsilon) t'}\right],$$
where the ##i\epsilon##s have been added to make the ##t'## integrals converge. If you follow along the calculation, you should be able to reproduce the denominator from the suggested result.
 
Thanks for the reply, the absolute value does accomplish the trick with the slight modification that I ignored the epsilons in the exponential when I did the integrals over t, otherwise I could not get the delta functions that I know I need.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top