Dynamic pressure variances in sealed and pressurised systems

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the behavior of pressurized fluids in a sealed system with a central agitator and attached cylinders. The user inquires about the potential for a Venturi effect to draw liquid back into the cylinder when the agitator is in motion, while also noting that the system's design limits the creation of voids. Concerns are raised about the risk of increased temperature and pressure in a closed system, which could lead to destructive failures if the liquid boils. The user also speculates on the possibility of creating a pressure gradient and oscillations for underwater communication. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities of fluid dynamics in pressurized systems and the potential implications for system design and safety.
Roger1946
Hi
Last did physics about 50 years ago but have become interested in how pressuried fluids behave in sealed containers when they are rapidly agitted or otherwise brought into motion.

Envisage a large circular container with a central power driven agitator. Two cylinders are attached . The whole system is pressurised with the liquid static. The agitator is now powered up and the liquid in the circular cyclinder is provided a dynamic force in one direction as well as being under pressure.
Each cylinder is controlled by two separate flaps, one to allow the circulating pressurised liquid to enter the cylinder (this opens into the flow of the liquid) and the other opens against the flow to permit the liquid in the cycliner to exit.

The question I have is to what extent will the rotating pressurise fluid create a venturi and suck the liquid back out of the cylinder.
Or could anyone suggest any literature I should read?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You might get some recirculation flow but since the system is full of liquid you won't be able create a void anywhere because any liquid removed would have nowhere to go .

The usual result of having an agitator of any type in a totally closed system without an adequate flow circulation path or means of removing heat is that the whole system just gets hotter and hotter and the pressure rises until something breaks .

If the heating is enough to make the liquid boil then the results at final failure can be very destructive .
 
Thanks for your thoughts Nidum.
I had hoped that the circular flow would induce a pressure gradient rising from P1 at the centre of the agitator to a greater pressure at the container wall P2. Also when the flow was deflected inwards by the outgoing cylinder flap the disorganised flow area after the edge of the flap would be at a pressure (P0) lower than P1 or P2 . This isolated lower pressure area could be turned on or off by the rapid opening/closing of the flap. All of this would help the volume of the cylinder to oscillate setting up a pressure vibration that could be used as an audio source at the end of the cylinder as a means of communication underwater.

Perhaps my variant of a water hammer as a communication device has become too commplicated!

Thanks Roger1946
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top