Dynamics with Polar coordinates

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a dynamics problem using polar coordinates, where the user has determined the magnitude of velocity as 90 mm/s but struggles to find the angle for components Vr and V(theta). They mention an alternative method involving the cosine law but seek a more universally applicable approach. The suggested method includes drawing right angles, labeling components, and applying elementary trigonometry. The cosine rule is referenced for deriving relationships between the variables, and derivatives are used to find rates of change. The conversation emphasizes logical reasoning and systematic problem-solving in polar coordinate dynamics.
Larrytsai
Messages
222
Reaction score
0
Hey guys,
I have attached the question with the diagram.
So far i have found my magnitude of velocity = 90mm/s.
im just really stuck now, i can't find my angle to find my components Vr and V(theta)
I also know that you can solve this problem by finding a relationship between theta and "r", with the cosine law, but i have done that method, and i want to figure this out the way that is applicable to all questions. Thnx =)
 

Attachments

  • dynamics2.jpg
    dynamics2.jpg
    32.3 KB · Views: 455
Physics news on Phys.org
Hey Larrytsai! :smile:

(have a theta: θ and a beta: β :wink:)
Larrytsai said:
… i want to figure this out the way that is applicable to all questions. Thnx =)

General method: just be logical, draw any right-angles you need to help you, and give everything names.

So draw the perpendicular from A to BC, call the foot of that perpendicular D, and use elementary trig. :smile:
 
According to cosine rule
r^2 = a^2 + b^2 -2*a*b*cosβ.
Find the derivative to get dr/dt. Find the second derivative to find d^2r/dt^2
Next according to sine rule
r/sinβ = a/sinθ or
r*sinθ = a*sinβ
Find the derivative to get dθ/dt. The second derivative will give you the remaining answers.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top