E/M Constant: Mass Conversion in Universe

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter nil1996
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Constant
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between mass and energy in the universe, particularly focusing on the implications of the equation E=mc² and the concept of conservation of mass and energy. Participants explore whether mass conversion in one part of the universe necessitates a corresponding conversion elsewhere, and the nature of energy as it relates to the total mass-energy content of the universe.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that if mass is being converted into energy in one part of the universe, there must be a simultaneous conversion occurring elsewhere.
  • Others argue that this reasoning conflates an equation describing mass-energy conversion with a conservation law, suggesting that the constancy of the speed of light does not imply a conservation relationship.
  • One participant clarifies that E=mc² represents a proportionality constant between rest mass and energy, and that the total mass-energy in the universe remains unchanged according to the first law of thermodynamics.
  • Another participant expresses a belief that E represents the energy of the universe while M represents its mass, suggesting a misunderstanding of the conservation of energy in this context.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit disagreement regarding the interpretation of mass-energy conversion and its implications for conservation laws. There is no consensus on whether the proposed argument about simultaneous conversions is valid.

Contextual Notes

Some limitations include potential misunderstandings of the relationship between mass and energy, as well as the distinction between conservation laws and proportional relationships. The discussion does not resolve these complexities.

nil1996
Messages
301
Reaction score
7
As the speed of light is constant in the universe, E/M should be constant.
Suppose that in some corner of universe mass is being converted in energy. So there must be some another corner of universe where mass is being converted into energy at the same time.Is my argument correct??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
nil1996 said:
As the speed of light is constant in the universe, E/M should be constant.
Suppose that in some corner of universe mass is being converted in energy. So there must be some another corner of universe where mass is being converted into energy at the same time.Is my argument correct??

Sorry, but this makes no sense.

You are confusing an equation that describes the conversion of one to another with a conservation law. That equation is not a conservation law just because c is a constant.

Zz.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
E=mc^2 is an equation that describes the constant of proportionality between an object's rest mass, and the energy that mass contains.

The sum total of mass and energy in the universe has to remain unchanged by the first law of thermodynamics, but mass energy equivalence does not indicate that there must be a certain proportion between the two when you sum all the mass and energy in the universe.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
thanks,
i was thinking that E represents energy of universe while M mass of universe ant that equation works as conservation of energy.
 
nil1996 said:
thanks,
i was thinking that E represents energy of universe while M mass of universe ant that equation works as conservation of energy.
E would represent all the energy due to all the mass in the universe, not the total energy in the universe. Hope that makes sense
 
sigma_ said:
E would represent all the energy due to all the mass in the universe, not the total energy in the universe. Hope that makes sense

yes got now
Thanks :thumbs:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K