E&M: Field of a Wire with non-uniform current

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a magnetostatics problem related to the magnetic field generated by a wire with non-uniform current. Participants are examining the application of Ampere's Law and the behavior of the magnetic field in different regions around the wire.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the correctness of a solution, specifically questioning the specification of the magnetic field outside the wire. There are inquiries about the curl of the magnetic field and its relation to current density, with some suggesting the use of Ampere's Law in differential form as a potentially quicker method.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants exploring different methods to analyze the problem. Some guidance is provided regarding the evaluation of the curl and the use of Ampere's Law, indicating a productive exchange of ideas without reaching a definitive conclusion.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of the problem, including the implications of zero current density outside the wire and the assumptions related to the magnetic field's behavior in that region.

KDPhysics
Messages
73
Reaction score
24
Summary:: Not sure if my solution to a magnetostatics problem is correct

[Mentor Note -- thread moved from the technical forums, so no Homework Template is shown]

I was trying to solve problem 2 from: https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/physics/8-022-physics-ii-electricity-and-magnetism-fall-2006/exams/exam2.pdf

Here is my solution:

IMG_20200522_214706.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks fine, except in part 4 you did not specify the field outside.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi and KDPhysics
do you mean the curl of the B field?
 
KDPhysics said:
do you mean the curl of the B field?
Yes, sorry, that's what I meant.
 
Since the current density is zero outside, is the curl also zero?
 
You have an expression for ##\vec B(\vec r)## outside the wire. Can't you just take its curl?
 
Isn't it faster to just use Ampere's Law in differential form?
 
I tried just evaluating the curl in cylindrical coordinates and found 0, as was expected.

Soo was my initial reasoning using Ampere's law correct? Or was it just a coincidence?
 
KDPhysics said:
Isn't it faster to just use Ampere's Law in differential form?
It is, but aren't you just curious whether you get the same answer if you did it the other way? Checking the answer by doing it in two different ways shows that it all hangs together and is not coincidence, not to mention reinforcing the belief in yourself that you can do this sort of thing on your own and do it correctly.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: KDPhysics
  • #10
That is true... Well I guess I now trust Ampere's Law even more than before. Thanks
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kuruman

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K