Easy problem still wrong answer

  • Thread starter Thread starter melissa_y
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the work needed to move a proton between two electric potentials, specifically from +630V to -60V. The initial calculation using the formula (Va-Vb)=Wba/q yields a result of Wba = -1.104 x 10^-16 J, which is correct based on the equation. However, confusion arises regarding the sign of the answer, as it depends on whether the work is done by the electric field or an external force. Participants express frustration over the ambiguity of the problem and the challenge of dealing with negative signs in physics calculations. The conversation highlights the common struggle with interpreting signs in work-energy problems.
melissa_y
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
How much work is needed to move a proton from a point with a potential of +630V to a point where it is -60.0V?

Ok so wouldn't I just use the equation:

(Va-Vb)=Wba/q
(-60-630)=Wba/(1.6 x 10^-19)
Wba=-1.104 x 10^-16 J
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your equation looks fine to me. What's the answer you expected?
 
Wba=-1.104 x 10^-16 J

But i keep entering it into the CAPA and it says wrong answer...
 
Try it without the negative sign.

The question is ambiguous, since it doesn't specify who or what is doing the work. If it's the electric field, then the answer is negative. If it's an external force, the answer is positive.
 
haha i love problems that are so simple yet you don't get an answer. Makes me start pounding on walls. Something simple has obviously gone unnoticed or like someone said, a negative sign is probably missing. Those negative signs piss me off to no end. Everytime i learn something where I am told the answer is always positive, i go to church for 40 hours straight to thank god for all the good he has done in the world such as the current subject i was just taught.

I truly hate negatives...
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top