(edit:solved) Vector Triple Product, Components Parallel and Perpendicular

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on resolving vector B into components parallel and perpendicular to vector A using the vector triple product. The user initially struggles with the problem but successfully applies the triple product expansion formula to derive the components. They conclude that vector B can be expressed as the sum of a perpendicular component (rejection) and a parallel component (projection) relative to vector A. The final formula confirms that B is represented as the combination of these two components. The user expresses relief at solving the problem after a period of confusion.
Seaborgium
Messages
14
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


By considering A x (B x A) resolve vector B into a component parallel to a given vector A and a component perpendicular to a given vector A.

Homework Equations


a x (b x c) = b (ac) - c (ab)

The Attempt at a Solution


I've applied the triple product expansion and reached

A x (B x A) = B (AA) - A (AB) = |A|2 B - |A||B|cos(θ) A

and hit a brick wall. I'm not entirely sure what the question is asking me to do, and I feel like I'm missing crucial information. Should I be splitting vectors A and B into their cartesian components?EDIT:

I got it. Taking A x (B x A) = |A|2 B - A (AB) , I can rearrange to find

|A|2 B = A x (B x A) + A (AB)

Dividing through by |A|2 results in

B = A x (B x A) |A|-2 + A ((AB)/|A|2)

So B is given as a component perpendicular (first term) and parallel (second term) to A.

I'm fairly sure this is right anyway. Stupid I suddenly work this out after posting here after looking at it for 30 mins before!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes FactChecker and berkeman
Physics news on Phys.org
FYI, The second term is called the "projection" of B on A and the first term is called the "rejection" of B on A.
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top