EE and CS bacground, No knowledge of mechanical sytem design,advice pls

AI Thread Summary
A computer programmer with a background in computer science and electrical engineering seeks to integrate programming with mechanical system design but lacks knowledge in the latter. Recommendations include reading machine design books and utilizing free software tools for simulation and CAD to enhance learning. The individual has completed courses in statics and dynamics, which provides a foundation for further study. Networking with mechanical engineers and visiting workshops for practical insights is also suggested. Engaging with experienced professionals can significantly aid in overcoming knowledge gaps in mechanical design.
bineyame
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hi All,

I am a computer programmer who has studied computer science and electrical engineering .It is my desire to combine my programming skill and EE background to design systems that potentially constitute mechanical parts( controlled by circuit and firmware...) .The problem is ,I have no knowledge of mechanical system design and i feel that it is a huge drag in my attempt to learn to do systems design. Please suggest ways ,free software tools,... that can help me build skills in mechanical part of system design.

Thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
bineyame said:
Hi All,

I am a computer programmer who has studied computer science and electrical engineering .It is my desire to combine my programming skill and EE background to design systems that potentially constitute mechanical parts( controlled by circuit and firmware...) .The problem is ,I have no knowledge of mechanical system design and i feel that it is a huge drag in my attempt to learn to do systems design. Please suggest ways ,free software tools,... that can help me build skills in mechanical part of system design.

Thanks

I suggest reading some books on Mechanics and then one on Machine Design. Although most EE's I know were required to take basic Statics and Dynamics courses in undergrad. If you did, then the Mechanics books might not be helpful but the Machine Design will.

CS
 
stewartcs said:
I suggest reading some books on Mechanics and then one on Machine Design. Although most EE's I know were required to take basic Statics and Dynamics courses in undergrad. If you did, then the Mechanics books might not be helpful but the Machine Design will.

CS

Thank you for your advice.Yes, i have taken statics and dynamics courses and I'm fairly comfortable in those areas. I'll read machine design books as you suggested and it will be great if there are software tools out there that i can get for free to complement my reading with simulation and CAD,any suggestion along that line?
 
bineyame said:
Thank you for your advice.Yes, i have taken statics and dynamics courses and I'm fairly comfortable in those areas. I'll read machine design books as you suggested and it will be great if there are software tools out there that i can get for free to complement my reading with simulation and CAD,any suggestion along that line?

I don't know of any free ones. Depending on the book, it may have some educational type software included that supplements your reading of the book.

CS
 
Don't attempt everything alone. I'd look to find a like minded ME and befriend a machinist or two. They haven't had time to forget what you won't have time to learn...

- Mike
 
Thank you for your great suggestion Mike ,I'll definitely try it! I'm also trying to arrange a visit to workshops and industries where i can see practical application of concepts...
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
8K
Replies
8
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
620
Replies
2
Views
773
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top