Effect of earth's rotation on an object on the surface

  • Thread starter Thread starter timarli
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rotation Surface
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the forces acting on an object at rest on the Earth's surface, considering both gravitational and rotational effects. The gravitational force is represented by F = G*m*M/R^2, while the rotational effect introduces an angular acceleration component, expressed as m*v^2/R. The net force acting on the object is determined by applying Newton's second law, leading to the conclusion that the normal force counteracts the gravitational pull and the effects of rotation. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding motion from an inertial perspective and how to calculate the net force without needing to identify all contributing forces. Ultimately, the interaction of these forces results in a balance that keeps the object stationary relative to the rotating Earth.
timarli
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Hi,


This is one of the things that confuses me.

Assume an object on the surface of the Earth has a mass m and F=m*g is the force on it due to the gravity. But also the Earth is rotating and although the radius is extremely large compared to the size of the object but it must be affected by this rotation as well, isn't it?

This is the part that I couldn't figure out. What is the total force on the body?

Is it:

(G*m*M/R^2) - (m*v^2/R); obviously first one gravity component and the second one angular acceleration.


Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
timarli said:
What is the total force on the body?

Is it:

(G*m*M/R^2) - (m*v^2/R); obviously first one gravity component and the second one angular acceleration.
No.

Look at the problem kinematically:
  • What kind of motion does an object on the surface of the Earth undergo from the perspective of an inertial observer?
    Ignore the Earth's orbit about the Sun. (e.g., use a frame in which the Earth is rotating but the center of mass is stationary.)
  • What is the acceleration of the object from the perspective of this inertial observer?
  • What does Newton's second law say that the total force must be?
 
Thanks a lot for the response D H. I will try to answer in the same order;

D H said:
  • What kind of motion does an object on the surface of the Earth undergo from the perspective of an inertial observer?
    Ignore the Earth's orbit about the Sun. (e.g., use a frame in which the Earth is rotating but the center of mass is stationary.)
OK, it's only Earth and the object and the observer. The observer looking from the top.
The object is undergoing a uniform angular motion.

D H said:
  • What is the acceleration of the object from the perspective of this inertial observer?
The acceleration is a=v^2/R

D H said:
  • What does Newton's second law say that the total force must be?
F = m*a

And the only acceleration is the angular one (v2/R); so the Earth pulls the object due to gravity and the object pulls Earth equally (as if the Earth is stationary - Newton #3). But then there is the rotational acceleration which means there is some unbalanced force. Earth is pulling the object more than the object pulls her.

Am I correct in thinking that;

N - m*M*G/R^2 = m*v^2/R

Even if it's correct, still not clear on the N though.
 
timarli said:
Hi,


This is one of the things that confuses me.

Assume an object on the surface of the Earth has a mass m and F=m*g is the force on it due to the gravity. But also the Earth is rotating and although the radius is extremely large compared to the size of the object but it must be affected by this rotation as well, isn't it?

This is the part that I couldn't figure out. What is the total force on the body?

Is it:

(G*m*M/R^2) - (m*v^2/R); obviously first one gravity component and the second one angular acceleration.


Thanks in advance.

That would be the weight of the mass as measured by a scale, on the equator. But not the total force.

Remeber that a mass resting on the Equator has net force applied to it close, but not equal to, zero (gravity pulling it in, the Earth pushing it out almost with the G force, the difference being your mv^2/R.
 
timarli said:
OK, it's only Earth and the object and the observer. The observer looking from the top.
The object is undergoing a uniform angular motion.
Correct.

The acceleration is a=v^2/R
Correct.

F = m*a
Correct. You know m, you know a, so what does that mean that the net force F must be? This is kinematics, not dynamics. You don't need to know *anything* about causal agents such as gravity. Just use F=ma.

But then there is the rotational acceleration which means there is some unbalanced force.
Exactly. Gravitation obviously is not the only force acting on an object sitting at rest (with respect to the rotating Earth) on the surface of the Earth. There's also a force that keeps the object object from sinking into the Earth. This is the same force that keeps your hand from penetrating into a wall when you lean against a wall, and that keeps your hand from penetrating into a book when you hold the book from beneath. It's called the normal force.

If you know the acceleration of some object, you do not need to know the individual contributors to the net force. Simply apply Newton's second law and the net force just pops out. In fact, you need to compute this net force kinematically to determine the normal force. You know the net force, you know the gravitational force, and assuming that the only other force, you can compute the normal force based on the fact that forces are subject to the superposition principle (net force is the vector sum of the individual component forces).
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
464
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
335
Views
15K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 63 ·
3
Replies
63
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K