Effect of moment of inertia on rolling distance

AI Thread Summary
A disk and a hoop of the same mass and diameter, when given the same torque and then allowed to roll freely, will roll the same distance but the disk will reach the endpoint first due to its lower moment of inertia. The disk achieves a higher maximum linear velocity compared to the hoop. The difference in their mass moment of inertia affects the ratio of rotational kinetic energy to translational kinetic energy, influencing their acceleration and travel time. Higher rotational kinetic energy indicates more energy is being converted to rotation, which can impact the overall dynamics of the rolling motion. The discussion highlights the importance of considering factors like friction and drag in analyzing rolling distances.
Poligon
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone, good day. this might be a simple question, but I need someone to check my answer.
A disk and a hoop, of same mass and same diameter, is first giving a torque (same amount of torque for both) then the torque is removed (the torque is acting on them for the exact same period of time), causing them to roll freely without slip. The question is, which one will roll further?
My answer to the question will be, both will roll the same distance. However, the disk will arrive at the end point first while the hoop will arrive at the end point later. Other than that, the disk will achieve higher maximum linear velocity in the process.
Is my answer correct? This is because they are being given same amount of energy. thus the distance they can roll should be the same.
Other than that, due to the different in mass moment of inertia, the rotational kinetic energy to translational kinetic energy ratio for disk and hoop is different. I am actually curious on what does this ratio implies? Higher ratio means more energy given is being converted to rotational KE, so? what does higher rotational KE implies? It got to be have effect on something, like the traveling time, the distance traveled, something like that. Can anyone relates these to me? Thank you very much for your time!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi everyone, First of all, I am very sorry that I misplaced the post.
Next, I noticed that the question is viewed by 135 people, but no replies. Am I not putting enough effort in solving my question? But i think i have first answered my question right?
I am new here, so please tell me if i overlooked any rules.
I really wish to know the answer to the questions.
Thank you!
 
If the only force acting on the rolling objects is friction with the surface they roll upon, then I think your answer is correct. However, if you take drag into consideration, things may be different.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top