Effect of Multiple Springs with Different Spring Constants on Plate Compression

AI Thread Summary
Attaching two helical springs with different spring constants to metal plates will result in unequal compression when a compressive stress is applied, even if the force is evenly distributed across the plate surface. The difference in spring constants affects the force each spring exerts, leading to potential torque on the plate if the compressions are not balanced. If the plate is allowed to tilt, this imbalance can cause it to tilt due to the varying forces from the springs. The scenario is analogous to standing on two different springs, where the differing spring constants lead to different responses. Thus, the interaction between the springs and the plate is crucial in determining the overall movement and stability of the system.
blumist
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
If i were to attach 2 helical springs (of same uncompressed length but different Spring constants) to metal plates on both ends and then apply a compressive stress on one of the plates, will both the springs compress the same? even though they hold a different tendency for compression?
And also, in what way does the difference in the 2 spring constants affect the movement of the plate?

Assume 1 plate to be fixed.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi blumist! :smile:

depends on where you apply the force …

even with identical springs, if you don't apply the force in the centre, the compressions will be different :wink:
 
uh oh... this was one of those times when u assume that the listener ( or reader in this case ) knows what u r thinking... :redface:
I forgot to mention... the force is equally distributed throughout the plate surface... What would happen for this case?
 
In that case, the plate will tilt if allowed to tilt. Same compression would result in different amounts of force. That would result in torque on the plate, and if unbalanced, that will cause the plate to tilt.
 
yup! :smile:

same as if you stood on two different springs … the presence of the plate makes no difference! :wink:
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top